Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35057185›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Novel Trends in Dental Color Match Using Different Shade Selection Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Louis Hardan, Rim Bourgi, Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez, Monika Lukomska-Szymanska, Ana Josefina Monjarás-Ávila, Maciej Zarow, Natalia Jakubowicz, Gilbert Jorquera, Tarek Ashi, Davide Mancino and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Color Comparison Between Intraoral Scanner and Spectrophotometer Shade Matching: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of gingival characteristics by professional versus smartphone imaging.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis of Aesthetic Preferences Regarding Gingival-Dental Color Combinations.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative Spectrophotometric Assessment of Crown Discoloration from Diverse Endodontic Sealers.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Louis HardanDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-2285
Rim BourgiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-8003-2664
Carlos Enrique Cuevas-SuárezDental Materials Laboratory, Academic Area of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Hidalgo State, Circuito Ex Hacienda la Concepción S/N, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, HGO, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-8984
Monika Lukomska-SzymanskaDepartment of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska St., 92-213 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6110-4298
Ana Josefina Monjarás-ÁvilaDental Materials Laboratory, Academic Area of Dentistry, Autonomous University of Hidalgo State, Circuito Ex Hacienda la Concepción S/N, San Agustín Tlaxiaca 42160, HGO, Mexico.
Maciej Zarow"NZOZ SPS Dentist" Dental Clinic and Postgraduate Course Centre, pl. Inwalidow 7/5, 30-033 Cracow, Poland.
Natalia Jakubowicz"NZOZ SPS Dentist" Dental Clinic and Postgraduate Course Centre, pl. Inwalidow 7/5, 30-033 Cracow, Poland.
Gilbert JorqueraDepartment of Prosthodontics, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago 12455, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9458-7890
Tarek AshiPrivate Practice, Zahnarztpraxis Ashi, Bahnhofstr 2, 09419 Thum, Germany.
Davide MancinoDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S 1121, Biomaterials and Bioengineering, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Naji KharoufDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S 1121, Biomaterials and Bioengineering, 67000 Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6768-138X
Youssef HaikelDepartment of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, INSERM UMR_S 1121, Biomaterials and Bioengineering, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since color matching is considered a subjective procedure, accurate shade choice is often the most challenging stage of recreating the natural appearance of teeth. Furthermore, accurate determination of tooth color is imperative for the final outcome of dental restorations. The purpose of this research is to assess the accuracy of color match between diverse shade selection methods throughout a systematic review and meta-analysis. Two independent investigators (L.H. and R.B.) screened the literature in five electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials or in vitro papers studying the effect of using either digital shade selection or visual shade selection on the accuracy of color match were included. A total of 13 manuscripts comprised the meta-analysis. Color difference (ΔE) between restorations where the shade matching was performed by the conventional method was greater than those where the shade matching was performed by computerized methods (

Indexed as

colordental shadedigital dentistryshade selectionsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35057185
PMCPMC8778907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.