Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35057148›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Concrete with Partial Substitution of Waste Glass and Recycled Concrete Aggregate.

Jawad Ahmad, Rebeca Martínez-García, Jesús de-Prado-Gil, Kashif Irshad, Mohammed A El-Shorbagy, Roman Fediuk, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Recyclable Materials for Ecofriendly Technology.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jawad AhmadDepartment of Civil Engineering, Military College of Engineering (Nust), Risalpur 24080, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9890-7158
Rebeca Martínez-GarcíaDepartment of Mining Technology, Topography, and Structures, University of León, Campus de Vegazana s/n, 24071 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8974-5759
Jesús de-Prado-GilDepartment of Mining Technology, Topography, and Structures, University of León, Campus de Vegazana s/n, 24071 León, Spain.
Kashif IrshadInterdisciplinary Research Center for Renewable Energy and Power Systems (IRC-REPS), King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6493-0969
Mohammed A El-ShorbagyDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8115-0638
Roman FediukPolytechnic Institute, Far Eastern Federal University, 690922 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-1240
Nikolai Ivanovich VatinPeter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1196-8004
Universidad de León · ESFar Eastern Federal University · RUKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals · SANational University of Sciences and Technology · PKPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RUPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current practice of concrete is thought to be unsuitable because it consumes large amounts of cement, sand, and aggregate, which causes depletion of natural resources. In this study, a step towards sustainable concrete was made by utilizing recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) as a coarse aggregate. However, researchers show that RCA causes a decrease in the performance of concrete due to porous nature. In this study, waste glass (WG) was used as a filler material that filled the voids between RCA to offset its negative impact on concrete performance. The substitution ratio of WG was 10, 20, or 30% by weight of cement, and RCA was 20, 40, and 60% by weight of coarse aggregate. The slump cone test was used to assess the fresh property, while compressive, split tensile, and punching strength were used to assess the mechanical performance. Test results indicated that the workability of concrete decreased with substitution of WG and RCA while mechanical performance improved up to a certain limit and then decreased due to lack of workability. Furthermore, a statical tool response surface methodology was used to predict various strength properties and optimization of RCA and WG.

Indexed as

compressive strengthsplit tensile strengthsustainable concretewaste glass

Identifiers

PMID35057148
PMCPMC8779647
OpenAlexW4205387859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.