Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35057106›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Molecular Engineering of Peptide-Drug Conjugates for Therapeutics.

Yu Fang, Huaimin Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu FangKey Laboratory of Precise Synthesis of Functional Molecules of Zhejiang Province, School of Science, Westlake University, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou 310024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7536-7099
Huaimin WangKey Laboratory of Precise Synthesis of Functional Molecules of Zhejiang Province, School of Science, Westlake University, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou 310024, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82022038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, hundreds of novel small molecular drugs used for different treatments have been studied in the three phases of clinical trials around the world. However, less than 10% of them are eventually used due to diverse problems. Even some traditional drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have faced similar dilemmas. For instance, many drugs have poor water solubility, are easily hydrolyzed, or possess undesirable toxicity, while a variety of cancer cells develop drug resistance (DR) or multiple drug resistance (MDR) towards chemotherapeutic agents after long-term therapy. In order to improve the efficacy and efficiency of drugs, research has been directed forward towards the creation of assemblies of peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs) which have proven to possess wide potential for overcoming such complications based on their excellent biocompatibility, controllable biodegradability, site-selective targeting, and comparably low cytotoxicity. In this review, we focus on the recent developments and advances made in the creation of self-assembled nanostructures of PDCs for cancer therapy, on the chemical and physical properties of such drugs and peptides, and how they are arranged together to form diverse supramolecular nanostructures. Additionally, we cover certain mechanisms regarding how peptides or their derivatives enhance the efficiency and efficacy of those selected drugs and provide a brief discussion regarding the perspectives and remaining challenges in this intriguing field.

Indexed as

hydrogelnanotechnologypeptide–drug conjugate (PDC)prodrugself-assembly

Identifiers

PMID35057106
PMCPMC8779610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.