Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35056600›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2022

Phylum Gemmatimonadota and Its Role in the Environment.

Izabela Mujakić, Kasia Piwosz, Michal Koblížek

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
41.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Izabela MujakićCentre Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Novohradská 237, 379 81 Třeboň, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5602-7331
Kasia PiwoszCentre Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Novohradská 237, 379 81 Třeboň, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3248-3364
Michal KoblížekCentre Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Novohradská 237, 379 81 Třeboň, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6938-2340
University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZ

Funding

Czech Science Foundation 19-28778X
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria are an important part of every ecosystem that they inhabit on Earth. Environmental microbiologists usually focus on a few dominant bacterial groups, neglecting less abundant ones, which collectively make up most of the microbial diversity. One of such less-studied phyla is Gemmatimonadota. Currently, the phylum contains only six cultured species. However, data from culture-independent studies indicate that members of Gemmatimonadota are common in diverse habitats. They are abundant in soils, where they seem to be frequently associated with plants and the rhizosphere. Moreover, Gemmatimonadota were found in aquatic environments, such as freshwaters, wastewater treatment plants, biofilms, and sediments. An important discovery was the identification of purple bacterial reaction centers and anoxygenic photosynthesis in this phylum, genes for which were likely acquired via horizontal gene transfer. So far, the capacity for anoxygenic photosynthesis has been described for two cultured species:

Indexed as

anoxygenic photosynthesisGemmatimonadetesGemmatimonadotaMAGsphotosynthetic gene cluster

Identifiers

PMID35056600
PMCPMC8779627
OpenAlexW4206314861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.