Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35056585›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2022

Ning Liu, Xue Wang, Qiang Shan, Le Xu, Yanan Li, Bingxin Chu, Lan Yang, Jiufeng Wang, Yaohong Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Combined Prokaryotic Transcriptomics and Proteomics Analysis of ClinicalInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Revealing the Mechanism of NLRP3 Inflammatory Pathway Activation through KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ning LiuDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xue WangDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Qiang ShanDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Le XuDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Yanan LiDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Bingxin ChuDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Lan YangDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Jiufeng WangDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-5611
Yaohong ZhuDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
China Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31873034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Bacillus cereusinflammasomeK+ effluxmultidrug resistanceprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID35056585
PMCPMC8777719
OpenAlexW4205854576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.