Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35056392›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2022

Current Status and Future Therapeutic Options for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation.

Sergii Tkach, Andrii Dorofeyev, Iurii Kuzenko, Nadiya Boyko, Tetyana Falalyeyeva, Luigi Boccuto, Emidio Scarpellini, Nazarii Kobyliak, Ludovico Abenavoli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Sergii TkachUkrainian Research and Practical Centre of Endocrine Surgery, Transplantation of Endocrine Organs and Tissues of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 01021 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Andrii DorofeyevShupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, 04112 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Iurii KuzenkoUkrainian Research and Practical Centre of Endocrine Surgery, Transplantation of Endocrine Organs and Tissues of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, 01021 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Nadiya BoykoRDE Center of Molecular Microbiology and Mucosal Immunology, Uzhhorod National University, 88000 Uzhhorod, Ukraine.
Tetyana FalalyeyevaEducational-Scientific Center, Institute of Biology and Medicine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine.
Luigi BoccutoSchool of Nursing, Healthcare Genetics Program, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29646, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-4270
Emidio ScarpelliniTranslational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (ChroMetA), Catholic University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Nazarii KobyliakDepartment of Histopathology, Medical Laboratory CSD, 03022 Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-9814-689X
Ludovico AbenavoliDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Graecia", Viale Europa-Germaneto, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5922-1524
Ministry of Health · UABogomolets National Medical University · UAClemson University · USKU Leuven · BEMagna Graecia University · ITShupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine · UATaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv · UAUzhhorod National University · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intestinal microbiota plays an important role in maintaining human health, and its alteration is now associated with the development of various gastrointestinal (ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, constipation, etc.) and extraintestinal diseases, such as cancer, metabolic syndrome, neuropsychiatric diseases. In this context, it is not surprising that gut microbiota modification methods may constitute a therapy whose potential has not yet been fully investigated. In this regard, the most interesting method is thought to be fecal microbiota transplantation, which consists of the simultaneous replacement of the intestinal microbiota of a sick recipient with fecal material from a healthy donor. This review summarizes the most interesting findings on the application of fecal microbiota transplantation in gastrointestinal and extraintestinal pathologies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeIrritable Bowel SyndromeFecal Microbiota TransplantationFecesHumansgastrointestinal diseaseshealthliver diseasesmetabolism

Identifiers

PMID35056392
PMCPMC8780626
OpenAlexW4205747422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.