Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35056316›Full record

Trial reportMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2021

Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study).

Philippe Rigoard, Manuel Roulaud, Lisa Goudman, Nihel Adjali, Amine Ounajim, Jimmy Voirin, Christophe Perruchoud, Bénédicte Bouche, Philippe Page, Rémy Guillevin and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Philippe RigoardPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Manuel RoulaudPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Lisa GoudmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2271-9855
Nihel AdjaliPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Amine OunajimPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-6430
Jimmy VoirinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hopitaux Civils de Colmar, 68000 Colmar, France.
Christophe PerruchoudService of Anesthesiology and Pain Centre, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bénédicte BouchePRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Philippe PageDepartment of Spine Surgery & Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Rémy GuillevinDepartment of Radiology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Mathieu NaudinDepartment of Radiology, Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Martin SimoneauDepartment of Kinesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Bertille LorgeouxPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Sandrine BaronPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Kevin NivolePRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Mathilde ManyPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Iona MaitrePRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Raphaël RigoardCEA Cadarache, Département de Support Technique et Gestion, Service des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication, 13108 Saint-Paul-Lez-Durance, France.
Romain DavidPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Maarten MoensDepartment of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Maxime BillotPRISMATICS Lab (Predictive Research in Spine/Neuromodulation Management and Thoracic Innovation/Cardiac Surgery), Poitiers University Hospital, 86021 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0979-2182
Université de Poitiers · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRVrije Universiteit Brussel · BECentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CACommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRHopitaux Civils de Colmar · FRUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

ABBOTT 6756227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established therapy to address refractory persistent spinal pain syndrome after spinal surgery (PSPS-T2), its lack of spatial selectivity and reported discomfort due to positional effects can be considered as significant limitations. As alternatives, new waveforms, such as burst stimulation and different spatial neural targets, such as dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS), have shown promising results. Comparisons between DRGS and standard SCS, or their combination, have never been studied on the same patients. "BOOST DRG" is the first prospective, randomized, double-blinded, crossover study to compare SCS vs. DRGS vs. SCS+DRGS. Sixty-six PSPS-T2 patients will be recruited internationally in three centers. Before crossing over, patients will receive each stimulation modality for 1 month, using tonic conventional stimulation. After 3 months, stimulation will consist in switching to burst for 1 month, and patients will choose which modality/waveform they receive and will then be reassessed at 6 and 12 months. In addition to our primary outcome based on pain rating, this study is designed to assess quality of life, functional disability, psychological distress, pain surface coverage, global impression of change, medication quantification, adverse events, brain functional imaging and electroencephalography, with the objective being to provide a multidimensional insight based on composite pain assessment.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaSpinal Cord StimulationCross-Over StudiesGanglia, SpinalHumansLower ExtremityProspective StudiesQuality of Lifeburstenergy consumptionfailed back surgery syndromehybrid stimulationleg painneurostimulationrefractory pain

Identifiers

PMID35056316
PMCPMC8780129
OpenAlexW4200224643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.