ArticleMicromachines2022
Quality Prediction and Control in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing via Novel Machine Learning Framework.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Binocular Vision-Based Image Extraction and Feature Analysis of Weld Beads in 316L Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Review of Research Progress on Trajectory Planning and Weld Seam Tracking in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Influence of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Parameters on the Morphology, Microstructure, and Hardness of DSS2209 Single-Bead Deposited Layers.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhanced air quality prediction using adaptive residual Bi-LSTM with pyramid dilation and optimal weighted feature selection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Transformer based spatially resolved prediction of mechanical properties in wire arc additive manufacturing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Determining optimal bead central angle by applying machine learning to wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM).Heliyon · 2024Article
- Wind Speed Prediction Based on Error Compensation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Programmable Thermo-Responsive Self-Morphing Structures Design and Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Quality Quantification and Control via Novel Self-Growing Process-Quality Model of Parts Fabricated by LPBF Process.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) is capable of rapidly depositing metal materials thus facilitating the fabrication of large-shape metal components. However, due to the multi-process-variability in the WAAM process, the deposited shape (bead width, height, depth of penetration) is difficult to predict and control within the desired level. Ultimately, the overall build will not achieve a near-net shape and will further hinder the part from performing its functionality without post-processing. Previous research primarily utilizes data analytical models (e.g., regression model, artificial neural network (ANN)) to forwardly predict the deposition width and height variation based on single or cross-linked process variables. However, these methods cannot effectively determine the optimal printable zone based on the desired deposition shape due to the inability to inversely deduce from these data analytical models. Additionally, the process variables are intercorrelated, and the bead width, height, and depth of penetration are highly codependent. Therefore, existing analysis cannot grant a reliable prediction model that allows the deposition (bead width, height, and penetration height) to remain within the desired level. This paper presents a novel machine learning framework for quantitatively analyzing the correlated relationship between the process parameters and deposition shape, thus providing an optimal process parameter selection to control the final deposition geometry. The proposed machine learning framework can systematically and quantitatively predict the deposition shape rather than just qualitatively as with other existing machine learning methods. The prediction model can also present the complex process-quality relations, and the determination of the deposition quality can guide the WAAM to be more prognostic and reliable. The correctness and effectiveness of the proposed quantitative process-quality analysis will be validated through experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.