ReviewMicromachines2022
Advances in Single-Cell Printing.
Review in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- CCNA2 orchestrates the PI3K/AKT signaling axis to propel prostate cancer metastasis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Photocontrol of Non-Adherent Cell Adhesion via Azobenzene-PEG-Lipid/Cyclodextrin Host-Guest Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Kidney diseases and single-cell sequencing research: a bibliometric analysis from 2015 to 2024.Renal failure · 2025Review
- Data acquisition approaches for single cell proteomics.Proteomics · 2025Review
- Conformal encapsulation of mammalian stem cells using modified hyaluronic acid.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2024Article
- Investigation of piezoelectric printing devices for oil-free and on-demand picolitre monodisperse droplet generation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Laser microdissection system based on structured light modulation dual cutting mode and negative pressure adsorption collection.PloS one · 2024Article
- The 3Rs in Experimental Liver Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Single-Cell Microarray Chip with Inverse-Tapered Wells to Maintain High Ratio of Cell Trapping.Micromachines · 2023Article
- The Effect of Ink Supply Pressure on Piezoelectric Inkjet.Micromachines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell analysis is becoming an indispensable tool in modern biological and medical research. Single-cell isolation is the key step for single-cell analysis. Single-cell printing shows several distinct advantages among the single-cell isolation techniques, such as precise deposition, high encapsulation efficiency, and easy recovery. Therefore, recent developments in single-cell printing have attracted extensive attention. We review herein the recently developed bioprinting strategies with single-cell resolution, with a special focus on inkjet-like single-cell printing. First, we discuss the common cell printing strategies and introduce several typical and advanced printing strategies. Then, we introduce several typical applications based on single-cell printing, from single-cell array screening and mass spectrometry-based single-cell analysis to three-dimensional tissue formation. In the last part, we discuss the pros and cons of the single-cell strategies and provide a brief outlook for single-cell printing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.