ArticleMicromachines2022
Optimization of Complete Rat Heart Decellularization Using Artificial Neural Networks.
Article in Micromachines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acellular Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds in Regenerative Medicine: Advances in Decellularization and Clinical Applications.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Article
- Recent advances in pericardium extracellular matrix for tissue regeneration, along with a short insight into artificial intelligence.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Review
- Advances in xenogeneic donor decellularized organs: A review on studies with sheep and porcine-derived heart valves.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Review
- Automation and Optimization of Rat Heart Decellularization Using a Vibrating Fluid Column.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole organ decellularization techniques have facilitated the fabrication of extracellular matrices (ECMs) for engineering new organs. Unfortunately, there is no objective gold standard evaluation of the scaffold without applying a destructive method such as histological analysis or DNA removal quantification of the dry tissue. Our proposal is a software application using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) to distinguish between different stages of decellularization, determining the exact moment of completion. Hearts from male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 10) were decellularized using 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in a modified Langendorff device in the presence of an alternating rectangular electric field. Spectrophotometric measurements of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and total proteins concentration from the decellularization solution were taken every 30 min. A monitoring system supervised the sessions, collecting a large number of photos saved in corresponding folders. This system aimed to prove a strong correlation between the data gathered by spectrophotometry and the state of the heart that could be visualized with an OpenCV-based spectrometer. A decellularization completion metric was built using a DCNN based classifier model trained using an image set comprising thousands of photos. Optimizing the decellularization process using a machine learning approach launches exponential progress in tissue bioengineering research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.