ReviewMicromachines2021
Acoustic Biosensors and Microfluidic Devices in the Decennium: Principles and Applications.
Review in Micromachines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coupling Between Thickness-Shear and Flexural Modes in AT-Cut Quartz Mesa Resonators with Beveled Edges.Micromachines · 2026Article
- 3D printing monolithic, multifunctional polymer acoustofluidic devices with tunable mixing and particle focusing.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Acoustofluidic Biosensors.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Motorized DNAzymes Drive Enhanced Electrochemical Biosensing for Rapid Bacterial Detection.Small methods · 2026Article
- Innovations in Biosensing Technologies for Cancer Diagnosis and Theranostics.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Biosensor technologies in cancer: tools for early detection and prognostic monitoring.Biomarker research · 2025Review
- Designing the Future of Biosensing: Advances in Aptamer Discovery, Computational Modeling, and Diagnostic Applications.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Development of a Generic Bio-Interface for Immuno-Biodetection on an Oxide Surface Targeting Pathogen Bacteria.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Updates on the Advantages and Disadvantages of Microscopic and Spectroscopic Characterization of Magnetotactic Bacteria for Biosensor Applications.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Development of a Mass-Producible Microfluidic Device for Single and Bulk Mycobacteria Investigations.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Microfluidic biosensors for rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria: recent advances and future perspectives.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
- Point-of-Care Testing for Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Biosensors for the detection of flaviviruses: A review.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025Review
- Advances in Aptamer-Based Biosensors for the Detection of Foodborne Mycotoxins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Schistosomiasis diagnosis: Challenges and opportunities for elimination.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Review
- Four-Channel Ultrasonic Sensor for Bulk Liquid and Biochemical Surface Interrogation.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Application of Shear Horizontal Surface Acoustic Wave (SH-SAW) Immunosensor in Point-of-Care Diagnosis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- A Novel Detachable, Reusable, and Versatile Acoustic Tweezer Manipulation Platform for Biochemical Analysis and Detection Systems.Biosensors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lab-on-a-chip (LOC) technology has gained primary attention in the past decade, where label-free biosensors and microfluidic actuation platforms are integrated to realize such LOC devices. Among the multitude of technologies that enables the successful integration of these two features, the piezoelectric acoustic wave method is best suited for handling biological samples due to biocompatibility, label-free and non-invasive properties. In this review paper, we present a study on the use of acoustic waves generated by piezoelectric materials in the area of label-free biosensors and microfluidic actuation towards the realization of LOC and POC devices. The categorization of acoustic wave technology into the bulk acoustic wave and surface acoustic wave has been considered with the inclusion of biological sample sensing and manipulation applications. This paper presents an approach with a comprehensive study on the fundamental operating principles of acoustic waves in biosensing and microfluidic actuation, acoustic wave modes suitable for sensing and actuation, piezoelectric materials used for acoustic wave generation, fabrication methods, and challenges in the use of acoustic wave modes in biosensing. Recent developments in the past decade, in various sensing potentialities of acoustic waves in a myriad of applications, including sensing of proteins, disease biomarkers, DNA, pathogenic microorganisms, acoustofluidic manipulation, and the sorting of biological samples such as cells, have been given primary focus. An insight into the future perspectives of real-time, label-free, and portable LOC devices utilizing acoustic waves is also presented. The developments in the field of thin-film piezoelectric materials, with the possibility of integrating sensing and actuation on a single platform utilizing the reversible property of smart piezoelectric materials, provide a step forward in the realization of monolithic integrated LOC and POC devices. Finally, the present paper highlights the key benefits and challenges in terms of commercialization, in the field of acoustic wave-based biosensors and actuation platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.