Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35056154›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Safety of Dronabinol and Nabilone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.

Ákos Bajtel, Tivadar Kiss, Barbara Tóth, Szabolcs Kiss, Péter Hegyi, Nóra Vörhendi, Boglárka Csupor-Löffler, Noémi Gede, Judit Hohmann, Dezső Csupor

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Exploring Cannabinoid Effects Using Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Inflammation and cancer: friend or foe?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Polypharmacological Effects of Cannabidiol.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  19. Should oncologists trust cannabinoids?Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ákos BajtelDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Tivadar KissDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3538-377X
Barbara TóthDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Szabolcs KissInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5032-866X
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Nóra VörhendiInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Boglárka Csupor-LöfflerInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Noémi GedeInstitute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.
Judit HohmannDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
Dezső CsuporDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.
University of Szeged · HUUniversity of Pecs · HUSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dronabinol, a natural cannabinoid, and its semi-synthetic derivative, nabilone, are marketed as medicines in several countries. The aim of our work was to systematically evaluate the frequency of adverse events related to dronabinol or nabilone treatment compared to placebo. Scientific databases were searched for placebo-controlled clinical studies of patients receiving either dronabinol or nabilone therapy with placebo control groups. This meta-analysis was reported following the PRISMA guidelines using the PICO format, and it was registered with the PROSPERO register. There were 16 trials included in the meta-analysis. In the nabilone studies, drowsiness was more than 7 times as frequent in patients treated with nabilone than in the placebo group (OR: 7.25; 95% CI: 1.64-31.95), and the risk of dizziness (OR: 21.14; 95% CI: 2.92-152.75) and dry mouth was also higher (OR: 17.23; 95% CI: 4.33-68.55). The frequency of headache was not different in the two groups. In case of dronabinol, the frequency of dry mouth (OR: 5.58; 95% CI: 3.19-9.78), dizziness (OR: 4.60 95% CI: 2.39-8.83) and headache (OR: 2.90; 95% CI: 1.07-7.85) was significantly higher in the dronabinol groups, whereas in case of nausea, drowsiness and fatigue there was no difference. The severity of adverse events was typically mild-to-moderate and transient. In a risk-benefit assessment, these adverse effects are acceptable compared to the achievable benefit. However, considering the diversity of the adverse effects, more studies are needed to provide a more accurate assessment on the side effect profiles of these two compounds.

Indexed as

adverse effectscannabinoidCannabisdronabinolmeta-analysisnabilonesafety

Identifiers

PMID35056154
PMCPMC8778752
OpenAlexW4205356856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.