Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35056120›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Review on Parallel Virtual Screening Softwares for High-Performance Computers.

Natarajan Arul Murugan, Artur Podobas, Davide Gadioli, Emanuele Vitali, Gianluca Palermo, Stefano Markidis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Molecular Dynamics and Other HPC Simulations for Drug Discovery.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Virtual Screening Process: A Guide in Modern Drug Designing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Molecular Dynamics as a Tool for Virtual Ligand Screening.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. ChemFlow─From 2D Chemical Libraries to Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Towards rational computational peptide design.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natarajan Arul MuruganDepartment of Computer Science, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0185-5724
Artur PodobasDepartment of Computer Science, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.
Davide GadioliDipartimento di Elettronica, Infomazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Emanuele VitaliDipartimento di Elettronica, Infomazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.
Gianluca PalermoDipartimento di Elettronica, Infomazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7955-8012
Stefano MarkidisDepartment of Computer Science, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery is the most expensive, time-demanding, and challenging project in biopharmaceutical companies which aims at the identification and optimization of lead compounds from large-sized chemical libraries. The lead compounds should have high-affinity binding and specificity for a target associated with a disease, and, in addition, they should have favorable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties (grouped as ADMET properties). Overall, drug discovery is a multivariable optimization and can be carried out in supercomputers using a reliable scoring function which is a measure of binding affinity or inhibition potential of the drug-like compound. The major problem is that the number of compounds in the chemical spaces is huge, making the computational drug discovery very demanding. However, it is cheaper and less time-consuming when compared to experimental high-throughput screening. As the problem is to find the most stable (global) minima for numerous protein-ligand complexes (on the order of 106 to 1012), the parallel implementation of in silico virtual screening can be exploited to ensure drug discovery in affordable time. In this review, we discuss such implementations of parallelization algorithms in virtual screening programs. The nature of different scoring functions and search algorithms are discussed, together with a performance analysis of several docking softwares ported on high-performance computing architectures.

Indexed as

chemical spacecomputational drug discoveryhigh-performance computers and acceleratorsmolecular dockingparallelizationvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID35056120
PMCPMC8780228
OpenAlexW3215053647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.