Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055890›Full record

ArticleInsects2021

Development of a Questionnaire to Assess Knowledge and Perceptions about Edible Insects.

Raquel P F Guiné, Sofia G Florença, Cristina A Costa, Paula M R Correia, Manuela Ferreira, João Duarte, Ana P Cardoso, Sofia Campos, Ofélia Anjos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Crickets (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Honey Bee (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raquel P F GuinéCERNAS-Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0595-6805
Sofia G FlorençaFaculty of Food and Nutrition Sciences, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2541-4448
Cristina A CostaCERNAS-Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.
Paula M R CorreiaCERNAS-Research Centre for Natural Resources, Environment and Society, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2023-4475
Manuela FerreiraHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.
João DuarteHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.
Ana P CardosoCIDEI-Centre for Studies in Education and Innovation, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5062-4098
Sofia CamposCIDEI-Centre for Studies in Education and Innovation, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal.
Ofélia AnjosSchool of Agriculture, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, 6001-909 Castelo Branco, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0267-3252

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/00681/2020 and UIDB/05507/2020 and UIDB/007421/2020 and UIDB/00239/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edible insects (EI) have been consumed as traditional foods in many parts of the globe, but in other regions, they are not readily accepted, particularly in Western countries. However, because EI are suggested to constitute a more sustainable protein food as compared with other sources of animal protein, they can be considered a future food that could help mitigate hunger and malnutrition. Additionally, new gastronomic trends are already targeting this area for exploring new potentialities. The objective of this work was to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess consumers' perceptions and knowledge about EI in seven different domains: D1. Culture and Tradition, D2. Gastronomic Innovation and Gourmet Kitchen, D3. Environment and Sustainability, D4. Economic and Social Aspects, D5. Commercialization and Marketing, D6. Nutritional Aspects and D7. Health Effects. The 64 items were subjected to item analysis and reliability analysis for validation, and factor analysis was also conducted to identify a grouping structure. The results validated all the items of the seven subscales with high values of Cronbach's alpha (α = 0.732 for D1, α = 0.795 for D2, α = 0.882 for D3, α = 0.742 for D4, α = 0.675 for D5, α = 0.799 for D6 and α = 0.788 for D7). However, by eliminating 17 items, the final values of the alpha increased in all subscales. Factor analysis with extraction by principal component analysis with varimax rotation extracted 14 factors that explained, in total, 65% of the variance, although the first two factors were the most important (35.7% variance explained). In conclusion, the confirmed usefulness of the questionnaire has been hereby validated for assessing consumer perceptions of and knowledge about EI.

Indexed as

edible insects consumptioninstrument validationquestionnaire surveyscale

Identifiers

PMID35055890
PMCPMC8780915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.