Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055803›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Relationships between Occupational Stress, Change in Work Environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms among Non-Healthcare Workers in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Yasuhiko Deguchi, Shinichi Iwasaki, Akihiro Niki, Aya Kadowaki, Tomoyuki Hirota, Yoshiki Shirahama, Yoko Nakamichi, Yutaro Okawa, Yuki Uesaka, Koki Inoue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasuhiko DeguchiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Shinichi IwasakiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Akihiro NikiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Aya KadowakiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Tomoyuki HirotaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Yoshiki ShirahamaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Yoko NakamichiDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Yutaro OkawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Yuki UesakaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Koki InoueDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Osaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to clarify the effect of occupational stress and changes in the work environment on non-healthcare workers' (HCWs) mental health during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted from 16 to 17 December 2020. Data from 807 non-HCWs were included. We evaluated occupational stress using the Generic Job Stress Questionnaire (GJSQ). Depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale, respectively. We collected demographic variables, work-related variables, and the variables associated with COVID-19. The adjusted odds ratios for depressive and anxiety groups were estimated using multivariate logistic regression analyses, adjusted for all the demographic variables, work-related variables, COVID-19-related variables, and the six subdivided GJSQ subscales. The results confirm a relationship between variance in workload, job future ambiguity, social support from coworkers, having contact with COVID-19 patients, and depressive and anxiety symptoms. Paying attention to job future ambiguity, the variance in workload at the workplace and individual perspectives, promoting contact and support among coworkers using online communication tools, and reducing contact with COVID-19 patients, will be useful for decreasing the depressive and anxiety symptoms among non-HCWs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Occupational StressAnxietyCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionHealth PersonnelHumansJapanPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Workplaceanxiety symptomsCOVID-19depressive symptomsjob future ambiguitymental healthnon-healthcare workersoccupational stressvariance in workload

Identifiers

PMID35055803
PMCPMC8775764
OpenAlexW4206169356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.