Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055776›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Project COALESCE-An Example of Academic Institutions as Conveners of Community-Clinic Partnerships to Improve Cancer Screening Access.

Katherine Y Tossas, Savannah Reitzel, Katelyn Schifano, Charlotte Garrett, Kathy Hurt, Michelle Rosado, Robert A Winn, Maria D Thomson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine Y TossasDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Savannah ReitzelDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Katelyn SchifanoMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Charlotte GarrettMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Kathy HurtMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Michelle RosadoMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Robert A WinnMassey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Maria D ThomsonDepartment of Health Behavior and Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Virginia, 56% of colorectal cancers (CRC) are diagnosed late, making it one of three enduring CRC mortality hotspots in the US. Cervical cancer (CCa) exhibits a similar pattern, with 48% late-stage diagnosis. Mortality for these cancers is worse for non-Latinx/e(nL)-Black people relative to nL-White people in Virginia, but preventable with equitable screening access and timely diagnostic follow-up. However, structural barriers, such as fractured referral systems and extended time between medical visits, remain. Because Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) care for a large proportion of racial and ethnic minorities, and underserved communities, regardless of ability to pay, they are ideal partners to tackle structural barriers to cancer screenings. We piloted a quality improvement initiative at five FQHCs in southcentral Virginia to identify and address structural, race-related barriers to CRC, as well as CCa screening and diagnostic follow-up using evidence-based approaches. Uniquely, FQHCs were paired with local community organizations in a didactic partnership, to elevate the community's voice while together, increase support, acceptance, uptake, and intervention sustainability. We report on project development, and share preliminary data within the context of project goals, namely, to increase cancer screenings by 5-10%, improve knowledge and diagnostic follow-up processes, and build longitudinal partnerships.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningQuality ImprovementReferral and Consultationacademic-community partnershipcervical neoplasmcolorectal neoplasmcommunity health centerscommunity organizationscommunity outreach and engagementdidactic partnershipsearly detection of cancerimplementation sciencequality improvement collaborative

Identifiers

PMID35055776
PMCPMC8775556
OpenAlexW4206469769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.