Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055733›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Co-Creation of Massive Open Online Courses to Improve Digital Health Literacy in Pregnant and Lactating Women.

Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez, Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez, Amado Rivero-Santanta, Alezandra Torres-Castaño, Ana Toledo-Chávarri, Andrea Duarte-Díaz, Vinita Mahtani-Chugani, María Dolores Marrero-Díaz, Alessia Montanari, Sabina Tangerini and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yolanda Álvarez-PérezCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-2863
Lilisbeth Perestelo-PérezEvaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), 38109 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-7313
Amado Rivero-SantantaCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5067-3196
Alezandra Torres-CastañoCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4690-1421
Ana Toledo-ChávarriCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 Tenerife, Spain.
Andrea Duarte-DíazCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38109 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1171-9945
Vinita Mahtani-ChuganiGerencia de Atención Primaria de Tenerife, 38004 Tenerife, Spain.
María Dolores Marrero-DíazGerencia de Atención Primaria de Tenerife, 38004 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8158-5172
Alessia MontanariAssociazione Comitato Collaborazione Medica (CCM), 10152 Torino, Italy.
Sabina TangeriniAssociazione Comitato Collaborazione Medica (CCM), 10152 Torino, Italy.
Carina González-GonzálezITED Research Group, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of La Laguna (ULL), 38200 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5939-9544
Michelle PerelloConsulta Europa Projects & Innovation, 35006 Las Palmas, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1587-0028
Pedro Serrano-AguilarEvaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), 38109 Tenerife, Spain.
On Behalf Of The Ic-Health Project Consortium
Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands · ESObservatorio de la Inmigración de Tenerife · ESServicio Canario de la Salud · ESUniversidad de La Laguna · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital health literacy (DHL) increases the self-efficacy and empowerment of pregnant and lactating women (PLW) in using the Internet for health issues. The European project IC-Health aimed to improve DHL among PLW, through the co-creation of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs).

methodsThe co-creation of the MOOCs included focus groups and the creation of communities of practice (CoPs) with PLW and healthcare professionals aimed to co-design the MOOCs. The quantitative measures of MOOCs' acceptability, experience in the co-creation process and increase in DHL (dimensions of finding, understanding and appraisal) were assessed.

results17 PLW participated in focus groups, 113 participants were included in CoPs and 68 participants evaluated the acceptability of MOOCs. A total of 6 MOOCs aimed at improving PLW's DHL were co-designed. There was a significant improvement in self-perceived DHL after using MOOCs (

conclusionsThe preliminary results of the quantitative assessment showed a higher self-perceived DHL after the IC-Health MOOCs. These results suggest that IC-Health MOOCs and the co-creation methodology appear to be a viable process to carry out an intervention aimed to improve DHL levels in European PLW.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceHealth LiteracyFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLactationPregnancydigital health literacyhealth educationlactationMOOCpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35055733
PMCPMC8775560
OpenAlexW4205454957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.