Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055713›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Ultrashort Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-3): A Psychometric Assessment.

César Merino-Soto, Milagros Lozano-Huamán, Sadith Lima-Mendoza, Gustavo Calderón de la Cruz, Arturo Juárez-García, Filiberto Toledano-Toledano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Factors Associated with AI Use in a Norwegian Sample.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. It Is Better for Younger Workers: The Gain Cycle between Job Crafting and Work Engagement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

César Merino-SotoInstituto de Investigación en Psicología, Universidad de San Martin de Porres, Lima 15024, Peru.ORCID 0000-0002-1407-8306
Milagros Lozano-HuamánEscuela de Psicología, Universidad de San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru.
Sadith Lima-MendozaEscuela de Psicología, Universidad de San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru.
Gustavo Calderón de la CruzInstituto de Investigación en Psicología, Universidad de San Martin de Porres, Lima 15024, Peru.
Arturo Juárez-GarcíaCentro de Investigación Transdisciplinar en Psicología, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca 62350, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3264-679X
Filiberto Toledano-ToledanoUnidad de Investigación en Medicina Basada en Evidencias, Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez, Mexico City 06720, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7126-5351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to determine the validity of the UWES-3, an ultrashort measure of work engagement lacking evidence in Hispanic populations. In total, 200 workers with heterogeneous positions and careers from Metropolitan Lima were enrolled via nonprobabilistic sampling. The UWES-3 and measures of external variables (work accidents, stress overload, and others) were used. Data were collected through a web platform. Items were analysed, nonparametric response theory methods (Mokken scale analysis and Ramsay curves) were applied to the items, and ordinal and linear regression were used to determine the relationships with external variables. The items had statistically similar distributional properties and monotonic associations with external variables but with fewer functional response options. The UWES-3 complied with the monotonic homogeneity model and invariant ordering of items; the scaling of the items, score (greater than 0.80), and reliability (0.94) were high. With the effects of age and sex controlled, the UWES-3 significantly predicted minor accidents at work and job satisfaction and revealed effects of stress overload and perceived efficacy. The theoretical implications of the UWES-3 as a brief unidimensional measure integrating the three original dimensions of the instrument and the practical implications of its use for research and professional practice are discussed.

Indexed as

Work EngagementWorkplaceHumansJob SatisfactionPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesaccidents at workengagementjob satisfactionstressvalidity

Identifiers

PMID35055713
PMCPMC8775405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.