Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055700›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Bibliometric Analysis on Global Psychological and Behavioral Research Landscape on COVID-19 Pandemic.

Xilu Dong, Xuqiu Wei, Fei Shu, Qiang Su, Juntao Wang, Ning Liu, Junping Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. People's Responses to Nuclear Weapons: Mapping Post-Cold War Research.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xilu DongChinese Academy of Sciences and Education Evaluation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, #1158, Block 2, Baiyang Street, Qiantang New District, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Xuqiu WeiInstitute of Information Management, Shandong University of Technology, 266 Xincun West Road, Zhangdian, Zibo 255000, China.
Fei ShuChinese Academy of Sciences and Education Evaluation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, #1158, Block 2, Baiyang Street, Qiantang New District, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Qiang SuZhejiang Academy of Higher Education, Hangzhou Dianzi University, #1158, Block 2, Baiyang Street, Qiantang New District, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Juntao WangFaculty of Engineering, Architecture & Information Technology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Ning LiuChinese Academy of Sciences and Education Evaluation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, #1158, Block 2, Baiyang Street, Qiantang New District, Hangzhou 310018, China.
Junping QiuChinese Academy of Sciences and Education Evaluation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, #1158, Block 2, Baiyang Street, Qiantang New District, Hangzhou 310018, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak in December 2019 has spread globally. The ongoing psychological and behavioral effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, which poses a major challenge to humanity, are of concern to researchers. To understand the academic community's attention, focus and research collaboration on psychological and behavioral research during the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a macro analysis using a bibliometric approach. Using the topic selection strategy of TS = ("COVID-19" OR "coronavirus disease 2019" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "2019-nCoV") AND TS = ("behavio*") AND TS = ("psycholog*"), 2096 high-quality research articles and reviews were downloaded as data from the Web of Science core collection on 16 November 2021. Through analysis and visualization, the following conclusions are drawn in this study: (1) The popularity and importance of psychological and behavioral research under COVID-19 has increased significantly and needs further attention; (2). Related research focuses on eight hotspots, with quarantine, health care workers, the elderly, students, pregnant women, family, consumers, social media and emergency preparedness knowledge as the focus of the research object; and (3) Research collaboration is relatively high at the author, organizational and national levels. However, low-income countries need to get more attention. Furthermore, this article would help researchers make decisions for the research of psychological and behavioral issues under COVID-19 and planning for future prospects to contribute to academic development and applied methodology.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedBehavioral ResearchBibliometricsFemaleHumansPandemicsPregnancySARS-CoV-2behavioralbibliometricCOVID-19psychologicalVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID35055700
PMCPMC8776113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.