Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055694›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Evaluation of Methods to Minimize Pain in Newborns during Capillary Blood Sampling for Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Magdalena Napiórkowska-Orkisz, Aleksandra Gutysz-Wojnicka, Mariola Tanajewska, Iwona Sadowska-Krawczenko

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06607575 (The Effect of Warming and Vibration Applications on Pain During Heel Blood Collection in Newborns), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06607575 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Warming and Vibration Applications on Pain During Heel Blood Collection in Newborns

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcibadem UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled140ConditionsPainArmsControl group, Warming, Vibration, Warming and vibration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Neonatal hypoglycaemia.BMJ medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena Napiórkowska-OrkiszDepartment of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Żołnierska 14c Street, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-2079
Aleksandra Gutysz-WojnickaDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Żołnierska 14c Street, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3813-3824
Mariola TanajewskaDepartment of Neonatology and Intensive Therapy of a Newborn, Provincial Specialist Hospital in Olsztyn, Żołnierska 18 Street, 10-561 Olsztyn, Poland.
Iwona Sadowska-KrawczenkoDepartment of Neonatology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, ul. Ujejskiego 75, 85-168 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLUniversity of Computer Sciences and Economics in Olsztyn · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the study was to assess the severity of pain experienced by a newborn during a heel puncture for screening using the Newborn Pain Scale (NIPS), measure the heart rate and compare the effectiveness of non-pharmacological methods of pain control.

designRandomized clinical trial. No experimental factors. The test was performed during routine screening. Surroundings: Provincial Specialist Hospital in Olsztyn. PATIENTS/

participantsPain was assessed in 90 full-term newborns. The newborns were rooming in with their mothers in the hospital.

interventionsNewborns were divided into three groups. Three different methods of pain relief were used: breastfeeding, 20% glucose administered orally and non-nutritional sucking.

main outcome measuresThe primary pain outcome was measured using the NIPS and the secondary pain outcome measures (heart rate, oxygen saturation) were measured using a pulse oximeter.

resultsDuring capillary blood sampling from the heel, most newborns,

conclusionsThis study did not answer the question of which pain management method used during the heel prick was statistically more effective in reducing pain. However, the results indicate that each of the non-pharmacological interventions (breastfeeding, oral glucose dosing and non-nutritive sucking) applied during heel puncture resulted in effective pain management in most of the newborns enrolled in the study. The relationship between heart rate variability and the severity of pain was confirmed. Mothers of newborns in the breastfeeding group were satisfied with the pain relief methods used in the child and the opportunity to console their newborn during painful procedures in a technologically invasive environment.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionPainChildFemaleHeelHumansInfant, NewbornPain ManagementPain Measurementneonatal painnon-pharmacological analgesiapain assessmentpain minimizationscreening

Identifiers

PMID35055694
PMCPMC8775482
OpenAlexW4205167244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.