Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055576›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Examining Type 1 Diabetes Mathematical Models Using Experimental Data.

Hannah Al Ali, Alireza Daneshkhah, Abdesslam Boutayeb, Zindoga Mukandavire

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hannah Al AliComputational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
Alireza DaneshkhahComputational Science and Mathematical Modelling, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7751-4307
Abdesslam BoutayebDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, University Mohamed Premier, P.O. Box 524, Oujda 60000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-4383
Zindoga MukandavireInstitute of Applied Research and Technology, Emirates Aviation University, Dubai 53044, United Arab Emirates.
Emirates Aviation University · AECoventry University · GBMohamed I University · MA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes requires treatment with insulin injections and monitoring glucose levels in affected individuals. We explored the utility of two mathematical models in predicting glucose concentration levels in type 1 diabetic mice and determined disease pathways. We adapted two mathematical models, one with β-cells and the other with no β-cell component to determine their capability in predicting glucose concentration and determine type 1 diabetes pathways using published glucose concentration data for four groups of experimental mice. The groups of mice were numbered Mice Group 1-4, depending on the diabetes severity of each group, with severity increasing from group 1-4. A Markov Chain Monte Carlo method based on a Bayesian framework was used to fit the model to determine the best model structure. Akaike information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criteria (BIC) approaches were used to assess the best model structure for type 1 diabetes. In fitting the model with no β-cells to glucose level data, we varied insulin absorption rate and insulin clearance rate. However, the model with β-cells required more parameters to match the data and we fitted the β-cell glucose tolerance factor, whole body insulin clearance rate, glucose production rate, and glucose clearance rate. Fitting the models to the blood glucose concentration level gave the least difference in AIC of 1.2, and a difference in BIC of 0.12 for Mice Group 4. The estimated AIC and BIC values were highest for Mice Group 1 than all other mice groups. The models gave substantial differences in AIC and BIC values for Mice Groups 1-3 ranging from 2.10 to 4.05. Our results suggest that the model without β-cells provides a more suitable structure for modelling type 1 diabetes and predicting blood glucose concentration for hypoglycaemic episodes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1AnimalsBayes TheoremBlood GlucoseInsulinMiceModels, TheoreticalBlood GlucoseInsulindiabetesmodel calibrationmodel selectionthresholds

Identifiers

PMID35055576
PMCPMC8776201
OpenAlexW4206368962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.