Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055559›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Multi-Regional Modeling of Cumulative COVID-19 Cases Integrated with Environmental Forest Knowledge Estimation: A Deep Learning Ensemble Approach.

Abdelgader Alamrouni, Fidan Aslanova, Sagiru Mati, Hamza Sabo Maccido, Afaf A Jibril, A G Usman, S I Abba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing LiRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdelgader AlamrouniDepartment of Environmental Education and Management, Faculty of Education, Near East University, Nicosia 700006, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-9012-8902
Fidan AslanovaDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Near East University, Nicosia 700006, Cyprus.
Sagiru MatiDepartment of Economics, Yusuf Maitama Sule University, Kano 700282, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-1413-3974
Hamza Sabo MaccidoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Baze University, Abuja 900288, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-2220-1260
Afaf A JibrilFaculty of Clinical Sciences, Bayero University, Kano 700006, Nigeria.
A G UsmanDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Near East University, TRNC, Mersin 99138, Turkey.
S I AbbaInterdisciplinary Research Center for Membrane and Water Security, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9356-2798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable modeling of novel commutative cases of COVID-19 (CCC) is essential for determining hospitalization needs and providing the benchmark for health-related policies. The current study proposes multi-regional modeling of CCC cases for the first scenario using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) based on automatic routines (AUTOARIMA), ARIMA with maximum likelihood (ARIMAML), and ARIMA with generalized least squares method (ARIMAGLS) and ensembled (ARIMAML-ARIMAGLS). Subsequently, different deep learning (DL) models viz: long short-term memory (LSTM), random forest (RF), and ensemble learning (EML) were applied to the second scenario to predict the effect of forest knowledge (FK) during the COVID-19 pandemic. For this purpose, augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (PP) unit root tests, autocorrelation function (ACF), partial autocorrelation function (PACF), Schwarz information criterion (SIC), and residual diagnostics were considered in determining the best ARIMA model for cumulative COVID-19 cases (CCC) across multi-region countries. Seven different performance criteria were used to evaluate the accuracy of the models. The obtained results justified both types of ARIMA model, with ARIMAGLS and ensemble ARIMA demonstrating superiority to the other models. Among the DL models analyzed, LSTM-M1 emerged as the best and most reliable estimation model, with both RF and LSTM attaining more than 80% prediction accuracy. While the EML of the DL proved merit with 96% accuracy. The outcomes of the two scenarios indicate the superiority of ARIMA time series and DL models in further decision making for FK.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningForecastingHumansModels, StatisticalPandemicsSARS-CoV-2ARIMAartificial intelligenceensemble ARIMAforest knowledgeprediction

Identifiers

PMID35055559
PMCPMC8775387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.