Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055383›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022

Evidence-Based Decision Support for a Structured Care Program on Polypharmacy in Multimorbidity: A Guideline Upgrade Based on a Realist Synthesis.

Truc Sophia Dinh, Maria-Sophie Brueckle, Ana Isabel González-González, Joachim Fessler, Ursula Marschall, Manfred Schubert-Zsilavesz, Ferdinand M Gerlach, Sebastian Harder, Marjan van den Akker, Ingrid Schubert and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Truc Sophia DinhInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-6751
Maria-Sophie BrueckleInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ana Isabel González-GonzálezInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Joachim FesslerGemeinschaftspraxis für Allgemeinmedizin, 65439 Floersheim, Germany.
Ursula MarschallDepartment Medicine/Health Care Research, Barmer, Lichtscheider Str. 89, 42285 Wuppertal, Germany.
Manfred Schubert-ZsilaveszInstitute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry/ZAFES, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Str. 9, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ferdinand M GerlachInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sebastian HarderInstitute for Clinical Pharmacology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marjan van den AkkerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-8637
Ingrid SchubertPMV Research Group, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Herderstrasse 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2191-1773
Christiane MuthInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8987-182X
The Evita Study Group

Funding

German Innovation Fund 01VSF16034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based clinical guidelines generally consider single conditions, and rarely multimorbidity. We developed an evidence-based guideline for a structured care program to manage polypharmacy in multimorbidity by using a realist synthesis to update the German polypharmacy guideline including the following five methods: formal prioritization in focus groups; systematic guideline review of evidence-based multimorbidity/polypharmacy guidelines; evidence search/synthesis and recommendation development; multidisciplinary consent of recommendations; feasibility test of updated guideline. We identified the need for a better description of the target group, decision support, prioritization of medication, consideration of patient preferences and anticholinergic properties, and of healthcare interfaces. We conducted a systematic guideline review of eight guidelines and extracted and synthesized recommendations using the Ariadne principles. We also included 48 systematic reviews. We formulated and agreed upon 34 recommendations for the revised guideline. During the feasibility test, guideline use enabled 57% of GPs to identify problems, leading to medication changes in 49% and self-assessed improvement in 56% of patients. Although 58% of GPs felt that it was too long, 92% recommended it. Polypharmacy should be systematically reviewed at least annually. Patients, family members, and healthcare professionals should monitor and adjust it using prospective process validation, taking into account patient preferences and agreed treatment goals.

Indexed as

continuity of careelderlyevidence-based guidelinemedication managementmultimorbiditypatient centered carepolypharmacyrealist synthesisstakeholder analysis

Identifiers

PMID35055383
PMCPMC8778077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.