ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2022
An Unsupervised Approach to Structuring and Analyzing Repetitive Semantic Structures in Free Text of Electronic Medical Records.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Healthcare knowledge graph construction: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art, open issues, and opportunities.Journal of big data · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic medical records (EMRs) include many valuable data about patients, which is, however, unstructured. Therefore, there is a lack of both labeled medical text data in Russian and tools for automatic annotation. As a result, today, it is hardly feasible for researchers to utilize text data of EMRs in training machine learning models in the biomedical domain. We present an unsupervised approach to medical data annotation. Syntactic trees are produced from initial sentences using morphological and syntactical analyses. In retrieved trees, similar subtrees are grouped using Node2Vec and Word2Vec and labeled using domain vocabularies and Wikidata categories. The usage of Wikidata categories increased the fraction of labeled sentences 5.5 times compared to labeling with domain vocabularies only. We show on a validation dataset that the proposed labeling method generates meaningful labels correctly for 92.7% of groups. Annotation with domain vocabularies and Wikidata categories covered more than 82% of sentences of the corpus, extended with timestamp and event labels 97% of sentences got covered. The obtained method can be used to label EMRs in Russian automatically. Additionally, the proposed methodology can be applied to other languages, which lack resources for automatic labeling and domain vocabulary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.