ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2021
MRI in Pregnancy and Precision Medicine: A Review from Literature.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- ESR Essentials: advanced MR safety in vulnerable patients-practice recommendations by the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology.European radiology · 2025Guideline
- Panic disorder during pregnancy and the first three years after delivery: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Assessment of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Perfusion Values of the Placenta in Intrauterine Growth Restriction by Using 3Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in an Indian Population: A Pilot Study.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2026Article
- A Rare Case of Spontaneous Rupture of Giant Sacrococcygeal Teratoma: A Case Report From Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal Imaging of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: A Single-Center Study of 75 Cases.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Real-Time Stereotactic MRI-Guided Sclerotherapy with Bleomycin-Polidocanol Foam: Illuminating Inaccessible Venous Malformations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Calcified intracranial epidermoid cyst presented during pregnancy: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Placenta segmentation redefined: review of deep learning integration of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound imaging.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025Review
- Managing Urethral Diverticulum During Pregnancy Utilizing Advanced Ultrasonographic Techniques: A Literature Review and Case Study.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- MRI-based pseudo-CT sequences as a radiation-free alternative to CT for obstetric pelvimetry: a proof-of-concept study.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Fetal Safety in MRI During Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Anthropometric Measurements and Laboratory Methods for Pregnancy: An Update Review to Evaluation of Body Composition.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a structured guide for trainees.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Gastric band slippage in pregnancy: A diagnostic dilemma.Obstetric medicine · 2024Article
- New-Onset Multiple Sclerosis in Pregnancy: Diagnostic Approaches and Treatment Dilemmas.Cureus · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Small Renal Masses After CT/MRI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The New Frontiers of Fetal Imaging: MRI Insights into Cardiovascular and Thoracic Structures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Liver imaging and pregnancy: what to expect when your patient is expecting.Insights into imaging · 2024Review
- Review
- Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in human placenta: insights into fetal growth restriction and congenital heart disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers excellent spatial and contrast resolution for evaluating a wide variety of pathologies, without exposing patients to ionizing radiations. Additionally, MRI offers reproducible diagnostic imaging results that are not operator-dependent, a major advantage over ultrasound. MRI is commonly used in pregnant women to evaluate, most frequently, acute abdominal and pelvic pain or placental abnormalities, as well as neurological or fetal abnormalities, infections, or neoplasms. However, to date, our knowledge about MRI safety during pregnancy, especially about the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents, which are able to cross the placental barrier, is still limited, raising concerns about possible negative effects on both the mother and the health of the fetus. Contrast agents that are unable to cross the placenta in a way that is safe for the fetus are desirable. In recent years, some preclinical studies, carried out in rodent models, have evaluated the role of long circulating liposomal nanoparticle-based blood-pool gadolinium contrast agents that do not penetrate the placental barrier due to their size and therefore do not expose the fetus to the contrast agent during pregnancy, preserving it from any hypothetical risks. Hence, we performed a literature review focusing on contrast and non-contrast MRI use during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.