Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055099›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Endothelial Dysfunction: An Intermediate Clinical Feature between Urolithiasis and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Javier Saenz-Medina, Mercedes Muñoz, Claudia Rodriguez, Ana Sanchez, Cristina Contreras, Joaquín Carballido-Rodríguez, Dolores Prieto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Is a Vitamin K Epoxide Reductase Complex Subunit 1 (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiology of Kidney Stones.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Javier Saenz-MedinaDepartment of Urology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, 28222 Majadahonda, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8568-854X
Mercedes MuñozDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacy Faculty, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Claudia RodriguezDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacy Faculty, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Ana SanchezDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacy Faculty, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Cristina ContrerasDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacy Faculty, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7015-7922
Joaquín Carballido-RodríguezDepartment of Urology, Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Autonoma University, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Dolores PrietoDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacy Faculty, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7049-5991
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An epidemiological relationship between urolithiasis and cardiovascular diseases has extensively been reported. Endothelial dysfunction is an early pathogenic event in cardiovascular diseases and has been associated with oxidative stress and low chronic inflammation in hypertension, coronary heart disease, stroke or the vascular complications of diabetes and obesity. The aim of this study is to summarize the current knowledge about the pathogenic mechanisms of urolithiasis in relation to the development of endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular morbidities.

methodsA non-systematic review has been performed mixing the terms "urolithiasis", "kidney stone" or "nephrolithiasis" with "cardiovascular disease", "myocardial infarction", "stroke", or "endothelial dysfunction".

resultsPatients with nephrolithiasis develop a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease with a relative risk estimated between 1.20 and 1.24 and also develop a higher vascular disease risk scores. Analyses of subgroups have rendered inconclusive results regarding gender or age. Endothelial dysfunction has also been strongly associated with urolithiasis in clinical studies, although no systemic serum markers of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation or oxidative stress could be clearly related. Analysis of urine composition of lithiasic patients also detected a higher expression of proteins related to cardiovascular disease. Experimental models of hyperoxaluria have also found elevation of serum endothelial dysfunction markers.

conclusionsEndothelial dysfunction has been strongly associated with urolithiasis and based on the experimental evidence, should be considered as an intermediate and changeable feature between urolithiasis and cardiovascular diseases. Oxidative stress, a key pathogenic factor in the development of endothelial dysfunction has been also pointed out as an important factor of lithogenesis. Special attention must be paid to cardiovascular morbidities associated with urolithiasis in order to take advantage of pleiotropic effects of statins, angiotensin receptor blockers and allopurinol.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Decision-MakingDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityEndotheliumHumansInflammationKidneyOrgan SpecificityOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesUrolithiasisBiomarkersReactive Oxygen Speciesendothelial dysfunctionkidney stonesoxidative stressurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID35055099
PMCPMC8778796
OpenAlexW4205979304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.