Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35055096›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Multiple Myeloma: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions.

Emma Verheye, Jesús Bravo Melgar, Sofie Deschoemaeker, Geert Raes, Anke Maes, Elke De Bruyne, Eline Menu, Karin Vanderkerken, Damya Laoui, Kim De Veirman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma VerheyeLaboratory of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.
Jesús Bravo MelgarLaboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Sofie DeschoemaekerLaboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5449-282X
Geert RaesLaboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9065-1549
Anke MaesLaboratory of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.
Elke De BruyneLaboratory of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4012-4617
Eline MenuLaboratory of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-6581
Karin VanderkerkenLaboratory of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.
Damya LaouiLaboratory of Myeloid Cell Immunology, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3373-1403
Kim De VeirmanLaboratory of Hematology and Immunology, Myeloma Center Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090 Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1313-6121
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

Research Foundation - Flanders 12I0921N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapeutic approaches, including adoptive cell therapy, revolutionized treatment in multiple myeloma (MM). As dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells and key initiators of tumor-specific immune responses, DC-based immunotherapy represents an attractive therapeutic approach in cancer. The past years, various DC-based approaches, using particularly ex-vivo-generated monocyte-derived DCs, have been tested in preclinical and clinical MM studies. However, long-term and durable responses in MM patients were limited, potentially attributed to the source of monocyte-derived DCs and the immunosuppressive bone marrow microenvironment. In this review, we briefly summarize the DC development in the bone marrow niche and the phenotypical and functional characteristics of the major DC subsets. We address the known DC deficiencies in MM and give an overview of the DC-based vaccination protocols that were tested in MM patients. Lastly, we also provide strategies to improve the efficacy of DC vaccines using new, improved DC-based approaches and combination therapies for MM patients.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersCancer VaccinesCell PlasticityClinical Decision-MakingCombined Modality TherapyDendritic CellsDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityHumansImmunomodulationMultiple MyelomaTreatment OutcomeVaccinationAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkersCancer Vaccinesdendritic cellsimmunotherapymultiple myelomavaccination

Identifiers

PMID35055096
PMCPMC8778019
OpenAlexW4205261080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.