ArticlePolymers2022
Dielectric and Mechanical Properties of CTAB-Modified Natural Rubber Latex-Cement Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)-modified natural rubber latex/Portland cement paste (CTAB + NL/PC) composites were fabricated by varying the NL/cement and CTAB/cement ratios to improve the elastic property of PC. The stability and workability of the CTAB-modified NL particles in the PC matrix were significantly improved. The microstructure and dielectric property analyses of PC, CTAB/PC, NL/PC, and (CTAB + NL)/PC composites were performed to describe the interaction mechanism between the CTAB-modified NL and PC. The portlandite phase in PC was reduced by incorporating CTAB + NL. Although the tensile strength of NL/PC was significantly increased, its compressive strength also greatly decreased by ~40.3%. The tensile and compressive strengths of CTAB/PC were not significantly improved. Notably, the tensile strength of (CTAB + NL)/PC was significantly increased compared to those of PC, CTAB/PC, and NL/PC, while the depreciated compressive strength was only 18.7%. The optimized compressive-tensile performance of (CTAB + NL)/PC was equal to that of PC. The dielectric constants of NL/PC, CTAB/PC, and (CTAB + NL)/PC were reduced due to the low dielectric constant of NL and the ability of CTAB to capture negative charges in the PC matrix, leading to a reduction in the negative surface charges and hence the interfacial polarization. This result was confirmed by the decreased loss tangent in a low-frequency range, which is usually reduced by decreasing the free charges. This work provides a comprehensive guideline for significantly improving the elastic property of PC while retaining a high compressive strength.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.