Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35054721›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

Multi-Criteria Decision Approach to Design a Vacuum Infusion Process Layout Providing the Polymeric Composite Part Quality.

Sergey Shevtsov, Igor Zhilyaev, Shun-Hsyung Chang, Jiing-Kae Wu, Natalia Snezhina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergey ShevtsovLaboratory of Composite Materials and Structures, Southern Center of Russian Academy of Science, 344006 Rostov on Don, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4275-6984
Igor ZhilyaevInstitute of Polymer Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland FHNW, CH-5210 Windisch, Switzerland.
Shun-Hsyung ChangDept. of Microelectronics, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9836-3234
Jiing-Kae WuChen-Wei International Co., Ltd., Kaohsiung City 80764, Taiwan.
Natalia SnezhinaDept. of Aircraft Engineering, Don State Technical University, 344000 Rostov on Don, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasingly widespread use of vacuum assisted technologies in the manufacture of polymer-composite structures does not always provide the required product quality and repeatability. Deterioration of quality most often appears itself in the form of incomplete filling of the preform with resin as a result of the inner and outer dry spot formation, as well as due to premature gelation of the resin and blockage of the vacuum port. As experience shows, these undesirable phenomena are significantly dependent on the location of the resin and vacuum ports. This article presents a method for making a decision on the rational design of a process layout. It is based on early forecasting of its objectives in terms of quality and reliability when simulating its finite element model, on the correlation analysis of the preliminary and final quality assessments, as well as on the study of the cross-correlation of a group of early calculated sub-criteria. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated by the example of vacuum infusion of a 3D thin-walled structure of complex geometry.

Indexed as

composite technologymulti-criteria decisionPareto frontierpolymeric compositesprocess modeling and optimizationvacuum infusion

Identifiers

PMID35054721
PMCPMC8778323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.