Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35054382›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Vertical Artifacts in Lung Ultrasonography: Some Common Clinician Questions and the Related Engineer Answers.

Marcello Demi, Natalia Buda, Gino Soldati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Lung Ultrasound: A Leading Diagnostic Tool.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcello DemiDepartment of Bioengineering, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1472-7863
Natalia BudaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Connective Tissue Diseases and Geriatrics, Medical University of Gdansk, Ul. Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-952 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-2736
Gino SoldatiIppocrate Medical Center, 55032 Lucca, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVertical artifacts, including B lines, are frequently seen in a variety of lung diseases. Their sonomorphology varies in length, width, shape, and internal reverberations. The reason for this diversity is still unknown and is the cause of discussion between clinicians and ultrasound physics engineers.

aimThe aim of this work is to sum up the most common clinician observations and provide an explanation to each of them derived from ultrasound physics. MATERIALS AND

methodsBased on clinical and engineering experiences as well as data collected from relevant literature, the sonomorphology of vertical artifacts was analyzed. Thirteen questions and answers were prepared on the common sonomorphology of vertical artifacts, current nomenclature, and clinical observations.

conclusionsFrom a clinical standpoint, the analysis of vertical artifacts is very important and requires that further clinical studies be conducted in cooperation with engineers who specialize in physics.

Indexed as

B linescardiac edemainterstitial pneumonialung ultrasonography LUSpulmonary fibrosissonomorphology of artifactsvertical artifacts

Identifiers

PMID35054382
PMCPMC8774376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.