Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35054354›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses.

Matteo Interlenghi, Christian Salvatore, Veronica Magni, Gabriele Caldara, Elia Schiavon, Andrea Cozzi, Simone Schiaffino, Luca Alessandro Carbonaro, Isabella Castiglioni, Francesco Sardanelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence diagnosis based on breast ultrasound imaging.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matteo InterlenghiDeepTrace Technologies S.R.L., Via Conservatorio 17, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3066-4276
Christian SalvatoreDeepTrace Technologies S.R.L., Via Conservatorio 17, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9312-4675
Veronica MagniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4240-0059
Gabriele CaldaraDepartment of Science, Technology and Society, Scuola Universitaria IUSS, Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori, Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Elia SchiavonDeepTrace Technologies S.R.L., Via Conservatorio 17, 20122 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1430-9637
Andrea CozziDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4922-7065
Simone SchiaffinoUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Rodolfo Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4243-888X
Luca Alessandro CarbonaroDepartment of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6852-6314
Isabella CastiglioniInstitute of Biomedical Imaging and Physiology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Via Fratelli Cervi 93, 20090 Segrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7191-5417
Francesco SardanelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6545-9427
University of Milan · ITIstituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a machine learning model based on radiomics to predict the BI-RADS category of ultrasound-detected suspicious breast lesions and support medical decision-making towards short-interval follow-up versus tissue sampling. From a retrospective 2015-2019 series of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies performed by four board-certified breast radiologists using six ultrasound systems from three vendors, we collected 821 images of 834 suspicious breast masses from 819 patients, 404 malignant and 430 benign according to histopathology. A balanced image set of biopsy-proven benign (n = 299) and malignant (n = 299) lesions was used for training and cross-validation of ensembles of machine learning algorithms supervised during learning by histopathological diagnosis as a reference standard. Based on a majority vote (over 80% of the votes to have a valid prediction of benign lesion), an ensemble of support vector machines showed an ability to reduce the biopsy rate of benign lesions by 15% to 18%, always keeping a sensitivity over 94%, when externally tested on 236 images from two image sets: (1) 123 lesions (51 malignant and 72 benign) obtained from two ultrasound systems used for training and from a different one, resulting in a positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.9% (95% confidence interval 36.3-55.7%) versus a radiologists' PPV of 41.5% (

Indexed as

breast cancercore needle biopsymachine learningpositive predictive valueradiomicssensitivityultrasound (US)

Identifiers

PMID35054354
PMCPMC8774734
OpenAlexW4206773646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.