Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35054230›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Subgroup-Specific Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Markers Influencing Pediatric Medulloblastoma Treatment.

Sutapa Ray, Nagendra K Chaturvedi, Kishor K Bhakat, Angie Rizzino, Sidharth Mahapatra

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanistic insights into medulloblastoma relapse.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sutapa RayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 601 S Saddle Creek Road, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Nagendra K ChaturvediDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 601 S Saddle Creek Road, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7037-898X
Kishor K BhakatFred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68105, USA.
Angie RizzinoFred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68105, USA.
Sidharth MahapatraDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 601 S Saddle Creek Road, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2483-0610
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Pediatric Critical Care Scientist Development ProgramK12HD047349 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HEATHER T. KEENAN, Kevin M Watt · 2004 to 2026
$17.0M
Research Pilot Project ProgramP30GM106397 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI JOHNSON, KEITH R · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
Elucidating the role of acetylation of APE1 in tumor growth and chemoresistanceR03CA235214 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BHAKAT, KISHOR K · 2019 to 2020
$161k
Edna Ittner Pediatric Fund N/AEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development K12 HD047349-17Fred and Pamela Buffet Cancer Center N/ANCI NIH HHS R03CA235214Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services LB506Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services LB606NIGMS NIH HHS GM106397Pediatric Cancer Research Group LB905Team Jack Brain Tumor Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common malignant central nervous system tumor in pediatric patients. Mainstay of therapy remains surgical resection followed by craniospinal radiation and chemotherapy, although limitations to this therapy are applied in the youngest patients. Clinically, tumors are divided into average and high-risk status on the basis of age, metastasis at diagnosis, and extent of surgical resection. However, technological advances in high-throughput screening have facilitated the analysis of large transcriptomic datasets that have been used to generate the current classification system, dividing patients into four primary subgroups, i.e., WNT (wingless), SHH (sonic hedgehog), and the non-SHH/WNT subgroups 3 and 4. Each subgroup can further be subdivided on the basis of a combination of cytogenetic and epigenetic events, some in distinct signaling pathways, that activate specific phenotypes impacting patient prognosis. Here, we delve deeper into the genetic basis for each subgroup by reviewing the extent of cytogenetic events in key genes that trigger neoplastic transformation or that exhibit oncogenic properties. Each of these discussions is further centered on how these genetic aberrations can be exploited to generate novel targeted therapeutics for each subgroup along with a discussion on challenges that are currently faced in generating said therapies. Our future hope is that through better understanding of subgroup-specific cytogenetic events, the field may improve diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment to improve overall quality of life for these patients.

Indexed as

group 3group 4medulloblastomaSHHWNT

Identifiers

PMID35054230
PMCPMC8774967
OpenAlexW4200006711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.