Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35054193›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Feasibility of Portable Microwave Imaging Device for Breast Cancer Detection.

Mio Adachi, Tsuyoshi Nakagawa, Tomoyuki Fujioka, Mio Mori, Kazunori Kubota, Goshi Oda, Takamaro Kikkawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mio AdachiDepartment of Surgery, Breast Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9359-0972
Tsuyoshi NakagawaDepartment of Surgery, Breast Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1967-0445
Tomoyuki FujiokaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7141-8901
Mio MoriDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6107-4519
Kazunori KubotaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Goshi OdaDepartment of Surgery, Breast Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan.
Takamaro KikkawaResearch Institute for Nanodevice and Bio Systems, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMicrowave radar-based breast imaging technology utilizes the principle of radar, in which radio waves reflect at the interface between target and normal tissues, which have different permittivities. This study aims to investigate the feasibility and safety of a portable microwave breast imaging device in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively collected the imaging data of ten breast cancers in nine women (median age: 66.0 years; range: 37-78 years) who had undergone microwave imaging examination before surgery. All were Japanese and the tumor sizes were from 4 to 10 cm. Using a five-point scale (1 = very poor; 2 = poor; 3 = fair; 4 = good; and 5 = excellent), a radiologist specialized in breast imaging evaluated the ability of microwave imaging to detect breast cancer and delineate its location and size in comparison with conventional mammography and the pathological findings.

resultsMicrowave imaging detected 10/10 pathologically proven breast cancers, including non-invasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and micro-invasive carcinoma, whereas mammography failed to detect 2/10 breast cancers due to dense breast tissue. In the five-point evaluation, median score of location and size were 4.5 and 4.0, respectively.

conclusionThe results of the evaluation suggest that the microwave imaging device is a safe examination that can be used repeatedly and has the potential to be useful in detecting breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancerdetectabilitydome antennamicrowave imagingscreeningultrawideband radar

Identifiers

PMID35054193
PMCPMC8774784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.