Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35054182›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Cluster Analysis of Cell Nuclei in H&E-Stained Histological Sections of Prostate Cancer and Classification Based on Traditional and Modern Artificial Intelligence Techniques.

Subrata Bhattacharjee, Kobiljon Ikromjanov, Kouayep Sonia Carole, Nuwan Madusanka, Nam-Hoon Cho, Yeong-Byn Hwang, Rashadul Islam Sumon, Hee-Cheol Kim, Heung-Kook Choi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Subrata BhattacharjeeDepartment of Computer Engineering, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-6915
Kobiljon IkromjanovDepartment of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Kouayep Sonia CaroleDepartment of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Nuwan MadusankaSchool of Computing & IT, Sri Lanka Technological Campus, Paduka 10500, Sri Lanka.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-1036
Nam-Hoon ChoDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Yeong-Byn HwangDepartment of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Rashadul Islam SumonDepartment of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Hee-Cheol KimDepartment of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Heung-Kook ChoiDepartment of Computer Engineering, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1372-7052
Inje University · KRSri Lanka Institute of Information Technology · LKYonsei University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A2C2008576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarker identification is very important to differentiate the grade groups in the histopathological sections of prostate cancer (PCa). Assessing the cluster of cell nuclei is essential for pathological investigation. In this study, we present a computer-based method for cluster analyses of cell nuclei and performed traditional (i.e., unsupervised method) and modern (i.e., supervised method) artificial intelligence (AI) techniques for distinguishing the grade groups of PCa. Two datasets on PCa were collected to carry out this research. Histopathology samples were obtained from whole slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). In this research, state-of-the-art approaches were proposed for color normalization, cell nuclei segmentation, feature selection, and classification. A traditional minimum spanning tree (MST) algorithm was employed to identify the clusters and better capture the proliferation and community structure of cell nuclei. K-medoids clustering and stacked ensemble machine learning (ML) approaches were used to perform traditional and modern AI-based classification. The binary and multiclass classification was derived to compare the model quality and results between the grades of PCa. Furthermore, a comparative analysis was carried out between traditional and modern AI techniques using different performance metrics (i.e., statistical parameters). Cluster features of the cell nuclei can be useful information for cancer grading. However, further validation of cluster analysis is required to accomplish astounding classification results.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclassificationcluster analysishistopathologyprostate cancersegmentation

Identifiers

PMID35054182
PMCPMC8774423
OpenAlexW4200003868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.