Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053957›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

What Is Safe and How Much Does It Matter? Food Vendors' and Consumers' Views on Food Safety in Urban Nigeria.

Stella Nordhagen, James Lee, Nwando Onuigbo-Chatta, Augustine Okoruwa, Eva Monterrosa, Elisabetta Lambertini, Gretel H Pelto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drivers of zoonoticOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stella NordhagenGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3801-3769
James LeeIndependent Researcher, Toronto, ON M6G 2K4, Canada.
Nwando Onuigbo-ChattaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Abuja 900103, Nigeria.
Augustine OkoruwaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Abuja 900103, Nigeria.
Eva MonterrosaGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Elisabetta LambertiniGlobal Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Washington, DC 20036, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1956-2874
Gretel H PeltoCollege of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA.
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition · CHAmerican Society for Nutrition · USCornell University · US

Funding

United States Agency for International Development 7200AA19CA00010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the food safety beliefs of vendors and consumers in a mid-sized Nigerian city using data from in-depth interviews and cognitive mapping techniques drawn from ethnography. We examine vendors' and consumers' perspectives on which foods are safe, which are not, and why; the place of foodborne illness among other health concerns and motivators of food choice; and how salient food safety is as a concern for vendors. The main perceived causes of unsafe food were found to be chemicals and insects; while bacterial illnesses were widely mentioned as a cause of gastrointestinal symptoms, these were not necessarily linked to food in consumers' minds. Respondents agreed strongly that certain foods (e.g., cowpea, beef, green leafy vegetables, and local rice) were less safe than others. The importance of food safety as a choice motivator among consumers varies depending on framing: when asked directly, it was prominent and closely related to visible cleanliness, but concerns about food safety competed in consumers' minds against other salient motivators of food and vendor choice, such as price. Most vendors did not see food safety, cleanliness, or hygiene as a key trait of a successful vendor, and just over half of vendors had any concern about the safety of their food. In conclusion, we note the implications for intervention designs, particularly the need to build upon consumers' and vendors' current beliefs and practices related to food safety in order to make foodborne disease prevention a more salient concern in food choice.

Indexed as

ethnographic researchfoodborne illnessfood choicefood safety attitudeknowledge and behaviorsociocultural beliefs and practicestraditional markets

Identifiers

PMID35053957
PMCPMC8774326
OpenAlexW4206279533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.