Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053856›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Revisiting Hemispheric Asymmetry in Mood Regulation: Implications for rTMS for Major Depressive Disorder.

Benjamin C Gibson, Andrei Vakhtin, Vincent P Clark, Christopher C Abbott, Davin K Quinn

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hemispheric asymmetries in borderline personality disorder: a systematic review.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in the Clinical Application of Neurostimulation in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Behavioral lateralization in bipolar disorders: a systematic review.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin C GibsonPsychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of New Mexico Psychology Department, Logan Hall, MSC03-2220, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
Andrei VakhtinThe Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, 1101 Yale Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.
Vincent P ClarkPsychology Clinical Neuroscience Center, University of New Mexico Psychology Department, Logan Hall, MSC03-2220, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9151-2102
Christopher C AbbottDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 2600 Marble Avenue NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.
Davin K QuinnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, 2600 Marble Avenue NE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA.
Mind Research Network · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Pilot Project Program (PPP)P30GM122734 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI MAYER, ANDREW ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$7.0M
NIH HHS P30GM122734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemispheric differences in emotional processing have been observed for over half a century, leading to multiple theories classifying differing roles for the right and left hemisphere in emotional processing. Conventional acceptance of these theories has had lasting clinical implications for the treatment of mood disorders. The theory that the left hemisphere is broadly associated with positively valenced emotions, while the right hemisphere is broadly associated with negatively valenced emotions, drove the initial application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). Subsequent rTMS research has led to improved response rates while adhering to the same initial paradigm of administering excitatory rTMS to the left prefrontal cortex (PFC) and inhibitory rTMS to the right PFC. However, accumulating evidence points to greater similarities in emotional regulation between the hemispheres than previously theorized, with potential implications for how rTMS for MDD may be delivered and optimized in the near future. This review will catalog the range of measurement modalities that have been used to explore and describe hemispheric differences, and highlight evidence that updates and advances knowledge of TMS targeting and parameter selection. Future directions for research are proposed that may advance precision medicine and improve efficacy of TMS for MDD.

Indexed as

hemispheric differencesiTBSMDDneurostimulationNIBSrTMStreatment

Identifiers

PMID35053856
PMCPMC8774216
OpenAlexW4205178386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.