Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053815›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

The Quest for Psychiatric Advancement through Theory, beyond Serendipity.

Robert E Kelly, Anthony O Ahmed, Matthew J Hoptman, Anika F Alix, George S Alexopoulos

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Replicability in Brain Imaging.Brain sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert E KellyDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, White Plains, NY 10605, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1783-498X
Anthony O AhmedDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, White Plains, NY 10605, USA.
Matthew J HoptmanClinical Research Division, Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4485-6102
Anika F AlixTeachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
George S AlexopoulosDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, White Plains, NY 10605, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past century, advancements in psychiatric treatments have freed countless individuals from the burden of life-long, incapacitating mental illness. These treatments have largely been discovered by chance. Theory has driven advancement in the natural sciences and other branches of medicine, but psychiatry remains a field in its "infancy". The targets for healing in psychiatry lie within the realm of the mind's subjective experience and thought, which we cannot yet describe in terms of their biological underpinnings in the brain. Our technology is sufficiently advanced to study brain neurons and their interactions on an electrophysiological and molecular level, but we cannot say how these form a single feeling or thought. While psychiatry waits for its "Copernican Revolution", we continue the work in developing theories and associated experiments based on our existing diagnostic systems, for example, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), International Classification of Diseases (ICD), or the more newly introduced Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Understanding the subjective reality of the mind in biological terms would doubtless lead to huge advances in psychiatry, as well as to ethical dilemmas, from which we are spared for the time being.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)International Classification of Diseases (ICD)medical modelmetasciencemind–brain gapprecision medicinepsychiatryResearch Domain Criteria (RDoC)research methods

Identifiers

PMID35053815
PMCPMC8773950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.