ArticleBrain sciences2021
Evaluation of Fixational Behavior throughout Life.
Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptual stabilization is weaker in older adults and correlates with spatial suppression of motion.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Wearable Eye Tracker Pupil Labs Neon for Gaze Fixation Analysis in Screen-Based Fixation Tasks: Comparison with Tobii Pro Fusion.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Fixation Stability of the Right and Left Eyes Under Binocular and Monocular Viewing Conditions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Natural history of cerebral visual impairment in children with cerebral palsy.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- A video-oculography study of fixation instability in myasthenia gravis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Cortical Reorganization After Optical Alignment in Strabismic Patients Outside of Critical Period.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
- Impact of Suspected Preterm Labor during Pregnancy on Cardiometabolic Profile and Neurodevelopment during Childhood: A Prospective Cohort Study Protocol.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The impact of eye dominance on fixation stability in school-aged children.Journal of eye movement research · 2023Article
- Gaze instability after exposure to moving visual stimuli in patients with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo quantify development of gaze stability throughout life during short and long fixational tasks using eye tracking technology.
methodsTwo hundred and fifty-nine participants aged between 5 months and 77 years were recruited along the study. All participants underwent a complete ophthalmological assessment. Fixational behavior during long and short fixational tasks was analyzed using a DIVE (Device for an Integral Visual Examination), a digital test assisted with eye tracking technology. The participants were divided into ten groups according to their age. Group 1, 0-2 years; group 2, 2-5 years; group 3, 5-10 years; group 4, 10-20 years; group 5, 20-30 years; group 6, 30-40 years; group 7, 40-50 years; group 8, 50-60 years; group 9, 60-70 years; and group 10, over 70 years.
resultsGaze stability, assessed by logBCEA (log-transformed bivariate contour ellipse area), improved with age from 5 months to 30 years (1.27 vs. 0.57 deg
conclusionsFixational behavior can be accurately assessed from 5 months of age using a DIVE. We report normative data of gaze stability and duration of fixations for every age group. Currently available technology may increase the accuracy of our visual assessments at any age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.