Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053738›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Social Networks and Social Support of Siblings of Children with Cancer.

Sarah E Wawrzynski, Melissa A Alderfer, Whitney Kvistad, Lauri Linder, Maija Reblin, Jia-Wen Guo, Kristin G Cloyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Technology-Mediated Support Among Siblings of Children with Cancer.Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah E WawrzynskiCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2756-2583
Melissa A AlderferCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Hospital-Delaware, Wilmington, DE 19803, USA.
Whitney KvistadSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA.
Lauri LinderCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2638-4164
Maija ReblinCollege of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-465X
Jia-Wen GuoIntermountain Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT 84113, USA.
Kristin G CloyesIntermountain Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT 84113, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2139-7716

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Personalizing Cancer Pain Care Using Electronic Health Record DataK01NR016948 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GUO, JIA-WEN · 2018 to 2020
$287k
Social media use and social support among adolescent siblings of children with cancerF31NR018987 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WAWRZYNSKI, SARAH E · 2019 to 2022
$101k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002538NINR NIH HHS F31 NR018987NINR NIH HHS F31NR018987NINR NIH HHS K01 NR016948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Siblings of children with cancer need support to ameliorate the challenges they encounter; however, little is known about what types and sources of support exist for siblings. This study addresses this gap in our understanding of the social networks and sources of support for adolescents with a brother or sister who has cancer. Additionally, we describe how the support siblings receive addresses what they feel are the hardest aspects of being a sibling of a child with cancer. During semi-structured interviews, siblings (ages 12-17) constructed ecomaps describing their support networks. Data were coded for support type (emotional, instrumental, informational, validation, companionship) and support provider (e.g., mother, teacher, friend). Network characteristics and patterns of support were explored. Support network size ranged from 3 to 10 individuals (M = 6 ± 1.9); siblings most frequently reported mothers as sources of support (n = 22, 91.7%), followed by fathers (n = 19, 79.2%), close friends (n = 19, 79.2%) and siblings (with or without cancer) (n = 17, 70.8%). Friends and brothers or sisters most often provided validation and companionship while instrumental and informational supports came from parents. This study provides foundational knowledge about siblings' support networks, which can be utilized to design interventions that improve support for siblings of children with cancer.

Indexed as

adaptationcancerchildhood cancerneoplasmoncologypsychologicalsiblingsocial adjustmentsocial support

Identifiers

PMID35053738
PMCPMC8774421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.