ReviewCancers2022
Coronary Artery Disease and Cancer: Treatment and Prognosis Regarding Gender Differences.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic control of T helper cells differentiation: a mechanistic insight into the association between acute leukemia and coronary artery disease.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Modified Frailty Index, Clinical Frailty Scale, ECOG Score, and ASA PS Score in Predicting Postoperative Outcomes in Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Survival of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Hematologic Malignancies-A Real-World Analysis.Cancers · 2023Article
- Inequity in care delivery in cardio-oncology: dissecting disparities in underrepresented populations.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Signature pattern of gene expression and signaling pathway in premature diabetic patients uncover their correlation to early age coronary heart disease.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2022Article
- Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in Healthy Aging Adults: Coronary Artery Disease, Lower Educational Status and Higher P-Selectin Levels.Clinical interventions in aging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease and cancer remain the leading causes of hospitalization and mortality in high-income countries. Survival after myocardial infarction has improved but there is still a difference in clinical outcome, mortality, and developing heart failure to the disadvantage of women with myocardial infarction. Most major cardiology trials and registries have excluded patients with cancer. As a result, there is only very limited information on the effects of coronary artery disease in cancer patients. In particular, the outcomes in women with cancer and coronary artery disease and its management remain empiric. We reviewed studies of over 27 million patients with coronary artery disease and cancer. Our review focused on the most important types of cancer (breast, colon, lung, prostate) and hematological malignancies with particular attention to sex-specific differences in treatment and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.