Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053531›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Breast Tumour Classification Using Ultrasound Elastography with Machine Learning: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Ye-Jiao Mao, Hyo-Jung Lim, Ming Ni, Wai-Hin Yan, Duo Wai-Chi Wong, James Chung-Wai Cheung

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ye-Jiao MaoDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Hyo-Jung LimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Ming NiSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.
Wai-Hin YanDepartment of Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Duo Wai-Chi WongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8805-1157
James Chung-Wai CheungDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7446-0569

Funding

Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 21410760200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound elastography can quantify stiffness distribution of tissue lesions and complements conventional B-mode ultrasound for breast cancer screening. Recently, the development of computer-aided diagnosis has improved the reliability of the system, whilst the inception of machine learning, such as deep learning, has further extended its power by facilitating automated segmentation and tumour classification. The objective of this review was to summarize application of the machine learning model to ultrasound elastography systems for breast tumour classification. Review databases included PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and EMBASE. Thirteen (

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebenignbreast cancerbreast neoplasmCNNcomputer-aided diagnosisdeep learningmalignancyshear wave elastographysonoelastography

Identifiers

PMID35053531
PMCPMC8773731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.