ArticleCancers2022
Therapeutic Challenges in Patients with Gynecologic Carcinosarcomas: Analysis of a Multicenter National Cohort Study from the French Prospective TMRG Network.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electroacupuncture Alleviates Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy via Multi-target Modulation: A Review from Mechanisms to Intervention.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Long Non-Coding RNAs in Gynecological Cancers: Pathogenic Signaling Pathways and Therapeutic Opportunities.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- A case report of comprehensive treatment for primary intraspinal carcinosarcoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Frontiers of Ovarian Carcinosarcoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2023Review
- Clinical, pathological, and comprehensive molecular analysis of the uterine clear cell carcinoma: a retrospective national study from TMRG and GINECO network.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- The Role of FBXW7 in Gynecologic Malignancies.Cells · 2023Review
- Epidemiology and prediction model of patients with carcinosarcoma in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGynecological carcinosarcomas are rare and aggressive diseases, with a poor prognosis. The rarity of these tumors explains the lack of robust and specific data available in the literature. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of initial adjuvant treatment and recurrent therapeutic strategies. PATIENTS AND
methodsA multicentric cohort study within the French national prospective Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors (TMRG) network was conducted. Data from all included carcinosarcomas diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively collected.
results425 cases of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcomas (
conclusionsInterestingly, this vast prospective cohort of gynecological carcinosarcoma patients from the French national Rare Malignant Gynecological Tumors network (i) highlights the positive impact of adjuvant CT on survival in all localized stages (including FIGO IA uterine carcinosarcomas), (ii) confirms the importance of platinum-based combination as an option for relapse setting, and (iii) reports median PFS for various therapeutic strategies in the relapse setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.