Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053514›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Implant Survival, Clinical Outcome and Complications of Megaprosthetic Reconstructions Following Sarcoma Resection.

Christoph Theil, Jan Schwarze, Georg Gosheger, Burkhard Moellenbeck, Kristian Nikolaus Schneider, Niklas Deventer, Sebastian Klingebiel, George Grammatopoulos, Friedrich Boettner, Tom Schmidt-Braekling

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Function and return to sports after proximal humeral replacement in patients with primary bone sarcoma.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christoph TheilDepartment for General Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Jan SchwarzeDepartment for General Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Georg GoshegerDepartment for General Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Burkhard MoellenbeckDepartment for General Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Kristian Nikolaus SchneiderDepartment for General Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Niklas DeventerDepartment for General Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-2060
Sebastian KlingebielDepartment for General Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
George GrammatopoulosDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7444-9498
Friedrich BoettnerHospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Tom Schmidt-BraeklingDepartment for General Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8807-1863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Megaprosthetic reconstruction of segmental bone defects following sarcoma resection is a frequently chosen surgical approach in orthopedic oncology. While the use of megaprostheses has gained popularity over the last decades and such implants are increasingly used for metastatic reconstructions and in non-tumor cases, there still is a high risk of long-term complications leading to revision surgery. This article investigates current implant survivorship, frequency and types of complications as well as functional outcomes of upper and lower limb megaprosthetic reconstructions.

Indexed as

endoprosthesismegaprosthesesmegaprosthesismegaprostheticrevision arthroplastysarcomatumor prosthesestumour prosthesis

Identifiers

PMID35053514
PMCPMC8773828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.