Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053481›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

The Overall Quality of Life and Oncological Outcomes Following Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer Survivors Results from a Large Long-Term Single-Institution Study.

Mihai Stanca, Dan Mihai Căpîlna, Cristian Trâmbițaș, Mihai Emil Căpîlna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Breaking the silence: the role of sexual communication on quality of life in women with cervical cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mihai StancaFirst Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology "G.E. Palade" of Târgu Mureș, Gheorghe Marinescu Street, Number 38, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2535-509X
Dan Mihai CăpîlnaFirst Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology "G.E. Palade" of Târgu Mureș, Gheorghe Marinescu Street, Number 38, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.
Cristian TrâmbițașAnatomy and Embryology Department, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology "G.E. Palade" of Târgu Mureș, Gheorghe Marinescu Street, Number 38, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.
Mihai Emil CăpîlnaFirst Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinic, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology "G.E. Palade" of Târgu Mureș, Gheorghe Marinescu Street, Number 38, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5661-2514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Cervical cancer patients have been found to have worse quality of life (QoL) scores due to cancer treatment, not only when compared to the general population, but also when compared to other gynecological cancer survivors. In Eastern European developing countries, the health care system often cannot afford the uppermost standardized treatment for these patients. In the absence of a comparable study in our country, the authors' aim for this retrospective cross-sectional observational study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and the QoL o cervical cancer survivors; (2) Methods: 430 patients were analyzed. The first objective is to evaluate the OS rates of patients with cervical cancer stages IA2 to IIB undergoing radical hysterectomy (RH) +/- neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy +/- chemoradiotherapy treatment combinations. The second objective is to assess their QoL, using two standardized questionnaires issued by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), namely QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24. (3) Results: The mean age of the participants was 51 years (22-76) and the average follow-up time was 65 months (2-128). At the time of the analysis, 308 out of 430 patients were alive, with a mean five-year OS of 72.4%. The multivariate Cox regression analysis identified stage IIB, parametrial invasion, and the lymph node metastases as independent prognostic risk factors negatively impacting the OS. Of the 308 patients still alive at the time of the analysis, 208 (68%) answered the QoL questionnaires. The QLQ-C30 shows a good long-term Global QoL of 64.6 (median), good functioning scores, and a decent symptom scale value. However, the EORTC QLQ-CX24 showed high values of cervical cancer-specific symptoms, namely: lymphedema, peripheral neuropathy, severe menopausal symptoms, and distorted body-image perception. The results also indicate a significant decline in the quality of sexual life with a low sexual enjoyment and decreased level of sexual activities. (4) Conclusion: Despite a good OS, in this setting of patients, cervical cancer survivors have a modest QoL and sexual function. Our study may provide a comparison for future randomized, controlled trials in Eastern European countries needing to confirm these results.

Indexed as

disease-free survivorslong-term cervical cancer survivalprognostic factorsQLQ-C30QLQ-CX24quality of lifesexual functioning

Identifiers

PMID35053481
PMCPMC8773665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.