Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053387›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Circulating miR-499a and miR-125b as Potential Predictors of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improvement after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.

Isabel Moscoso, María Cebro-Márquez, Álvaro Martínez-Gómez, Charigan Abou-Jokh, María Amparo Martínez-Monzonís, José Luis Martínez-Sande, Laila González-Melchor, Javier García-Seara, Xesús Alberte Fernández-López, Sandra Moraña-Fernández and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Expression Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular and cellular medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Isabel MoscosoCardiology Group, Centre for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-4666
María Cebro-MárquezCardiology Group, Centre for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6427-7955
Álvaro Martínez-GómezDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Charigan Abou-JokhDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
María Amparo Martínez-MonzonísDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
José Luis Martínez-SandeDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Laila González-MelchorDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Javier García-SearaDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7903-9490
Xesús Alberte Fernández-LópezDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Sandra Moraña-FernándezDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
José R González-JuanateyCardiology Group, Centre for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Moisés Rodríguez-MañeroDepartment of Cardiology and Coronary Unit and Cellular and Molecular Cardiology Research Unit, Institute of Biomedical Research (IDIS-SERGAS), University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Ricardo LageCardiology Group, Centre for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Funding

European Union ED431G 2019/02Sociedad Española de Cardiología SEC_ROVI 2017Xunta de Galicia GPC 2016/022Xunta de Galicia GRC 2019/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy represents a therapeutic option for heart failure drug-refractory patients. However, due to the lack of success in 30% of the cases, there is a demand for an in-depth analysis of individual heterogeneity. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of circulating miRNA differences. Responder patients were defined by a composite endpoint of the presence of left ventricular reverse remodelling (a reduction ≥15% in telesystolic volume and an increment ≥10% in left ventricular ejection fraction). Circulating miRNAs signature was analysed at the time of the procedure and at a 6-month follow-up. An expression analysis showed, both at baseline and at follow-up, differences between responders and non-responders. Responders presented lower baseline expressions of miR-499, and at follow-up, downregulation of miR-125b-5p, both associated with a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction. The miRNA profile differences showed a marked sensitivity to distinguish between responders and non-responders. Our data suggest that miRNA differences might contribute to prognostic stratification of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy and suggest that preimplant cardiac context as well as remodelling response are key to therapeutic success.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyAgedElectrocardiographyFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHeart VentriclesHumansMaleMicroRNAsModels, BiologicalPredictive Value of TestsStroke VolumeMicroRNAsMIRN125 microRNA, humanMIRN499 microRNA, humanadverse remodellingcardiac biomarkercardiac resynchronization therapycardiac therapeutic targetheart failuremicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID35053387
PMCPMC8773679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.