Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053191›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2021

A Comprehensive Review on the Heavy Metal Toxicity and Sequestration in Plants.

Riyazuddin Riyazuddin, Nisha Nisha, Bushra Ejaz, M Iqbal R Khan, Manu Kumar, Pramod W Ramteke, Ravi Gupta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 308 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Co-application of selenium nanoparticles andFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Riyazuddin RiyazuddinDepartment of Plant Biology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Kozep fasor 52, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-2580-2811
Nisha NishaDepartment of Integrated Plant Protection, Faculty of Horticultural Science, Plant Protection Institute, Szent István University, 2100 Godollo, Hungary.
Bushra EjazDepartment of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.
M Iqbal R KhanDepartment of Botany, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi 110062, India.
Manu KumarDepartment of Life Science, Dongguk University, Seoul 10326, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3490-5062
Pramod W RamtekeDepartment of Life Sciences, Mandsaur University, Mandsaur 458001, India.
Ravi GuptaCollege of General Education, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5242-9528
Jamia Hamdard · INDongguk University · KRKookmin University · KRMagyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem · HUUniversity of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heavy metal (HM) toxicity has become a global concern in recent years and is imposing a severe threat to the environment and human health. In the case of plants, a higher concentration of HMs, above a threshold, adversely affects cellular metabolism because of the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which target the key biological molecules. Moreover, some of the HMs such as mercury and arsenic, among others, can directly alter the protein/enzyme activities by targeting their -SH group to further impede the cellular metabolism. Particularly, inhibition of photosynthesis has been reported under HM toxicity because HMs trigger the degradation of chlorophyll molecules by enhancing the chlorophyllase activity and by replacing the central Mg ion in the porphyrin ring which affects overall plant growth and yield. Consequently, plants utilize various strategies to mitigate the negative impact of HM toxicity by limiting the uptake of these HMs and their sequestration into the vacuoles with the help of various molecules including proteins such as phytochelatins, metallothionein, compatible solutes, and secondary metabolites. In this comprehensive review, we provided insights towards a wider aspect of HM toxicity, ranging from their negative impact on plant growth to the mechanisms employed by the plants to alleviate the HM toxicity and presented the molecular mechanism of HMs toxicity and sequestration in plants.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavyHumansMetallothioneinPlant DevelopmentPlantsReactive Oxygen SpeciesMetallothioneinMetals, HeavyReactive Oxygen Speciesantioxidantsheavy metalsphotosynthesisredox statusROSsequestration

Identifiers

PMID35053191
PMCPMC8774178
OpenAlexW4200124031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.