Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053144›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

A TRICk to Improve the Effectiveness of RIC: Role of Limb Temperature in Enhancing the Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Conditioning.

Claudia Penna, Matteo Sorge, Francesca Tullio, Stefano Comità, Saveria Femminò, Mara Brancaccio, Pasquale Pagliaro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning and/or erythropoietin on lung injury induced by skeletal ischemia reperfusion: role of the NLRP3 inflammasome.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia PennaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Matteo SorgeDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0635-3654
Francesca TullioDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Stefano ComitàDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.
Saveria FemminòDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4644-0784
Mara BrancaccioDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2327-6846
Pasquale PagliaroDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4386-1383
University of Turin · IT

Funding

University of Turin ex 60%-RILO (MUR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury is still an unmet clinical need. A large variability of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) protection has been reported; however, no studies have considered the temperature of the ischemic limb. We analyzed the effects of temperature on RIC protection.

methodsLeft hind-limbs of anesthetized male mice were immersed in warm (40 °C, warm-RIC) or cold (20 °C, cold-RIC) water and subjected to a RIC protocol (4 × 5 min limb ischemia/reperfusion). In the control groups (warm-CTR or cold-CTR), the limbs underwent thermic conditions only. Isolated hearts underwent 30 min ischemia and 60 min reperfusion. A PI3K-inhibitor, LY294002 (5 µM), was infused in warm-RIC hearts before the IR protocol (warm-RIC LY). Infarct size was evaluated by nitro blue tetrazolium staining and expressed as the percent of risk area.

resultsWhile cold-RIC did not reduce the infarct size compared to cold-CTR (51 ± 1.62% vs. 54 ± 1.07% of risk area,

conclusionour study shows a remarkable difference between warm-RIC and cold-RIC in terms of infarct size reduction, supporting a pivotal role for limb temperature in RIC-induced cardioprotection.

Indexed as

cardioprotectioninfarct sizeremote ischemic conditioningreperfusion injury

Identifiers

PMID35053144
PMCPMC8773203
OpenAlexW4206838566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.