Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053108›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Predicting Current Potential Distribution and the Range Dynamics of

Yingxuan Yin, Qing He, Xiaowen Pan, Qiyong Liu, Yinjuan Wu, Xuerong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Climate-driven invasion ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  6. BAM 15 Exerts Molluscicidal Effects onMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Effectiveness of JuvenileAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yingxuan YinDepartment of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7586-1126
Qing HeDepartment of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8005-5383
Xiaowen PanDepartment of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Qiyong LiuState Key Laboratory of Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4066-7988
Yinjuan WuDepartment of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xuerong LiDepartment of Parasitology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7559-7687

Funding

Guangdong Natural Science Foundation 2019A1515010583National Key R&D Program of China 2020YFC1200100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

biological invasiondispersal riskMaxEntPomacea canaliculata

Identifiers

PMID35053108
PMCPMC8772860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.