Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35053025›Full record

ArticleBiology2021

Forensic Tools for Species Identification of Skeletal Remains: Metrics, Statistics, and OsteoID.

Heather M Garvin, Rachel Dunn, Sabrina B Sholts, M Schuyler Litten, Merna Mohamed, Nathan Kuttickat, Noah Skantz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather M GarvinDepartment of Anatomy, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA.
Rachel DunnDepartment of Anatomy, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA.
Sabrina B SholtsNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20056, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4168-0578
M Schuyler LittenNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20056, USA.
Merna MohamedCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA.
Nathan KuttickatCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA.
Noah SkantzCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Des Moines University, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1927-9382

Funding

National Institute of Justice NIJ 2018-DU-BX-0229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although nonhuman remains constitute a significant portion of forensic anthropological casework, the potential use of bone metrics to assess the human origin and to classify species of skeletal remains has not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to assess the utility of quantitative methods in distinguishing human from nonhuman remains and present additional resources for species identification. Over 50,000 measurements were compiled from humans and 27 nonhuman (mostly North American) species. Decision trees developed from the long bone data can differentiate human from nonhuman remains with over 90% accuracy (>98% accuracy for the human sample), even if all long bones are pooled. Stepwise discriminant function results were slightly lower (>87.4% overall accuracy). The quantitative models can be used to support visual identifications or preliminarily assess forensic significance at scenes. For species classification, bone-specific discriminant functions returned accuracies between 77.7% and 89.1%, but classification results varied highly across species. From the study data, we developed a web tool, OsteoID, for users who can input measurements and be shown photographs of potential bones/species to aid in visual identification. OsteoID also includes supplementary images (e.g., 3D scans), creating an additional resource for forensic anthropologists and others involved in skeletal species identification and comparative osteology.

Indexed as

comparative osteologyforensic anthropologyforensic significancehuman osteologymedicolegal death investigationnonhumanskeletal morphology

Identifiers

PMID35053025
PMCPMC8773354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.