ReviewBiology2021
Heterotypic Multicellular Spheroids as Experimental and Preclinical Models of Sprouting Angiogenesis.
Review in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- SHEDs and BMSCs exhibit distinct lineage preferences in HUVECs dynamic spheroid co-cultures: vascular versus osteogenic commitment.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026Article
- Strategies to control cellular spatial organization in microphysiological systems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Review
- Heat shock protein family D member 1 mediates lung cancer cell‑induced angiogenesis of endothelial cells.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
- Insights into the mechanisms of angiogenesis in hepatoblastoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Angiogenesis and Immunosuppressive Niche in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Reshaping Vascular - Immune Axis to Potentiate antiPD - 1/PD - L1 Therapy.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
- Scaffold-free 3D culture systems for stem cell-based tissue regeneration.APL bioengineering · 2024Review
- Integrating Vascular Phenotypic and Proteomic Analysis in an Open Microfluidic Platform.ACS nano · 2024Article
- Tumoroids, a valid preclinical screening platform for monitoring cancer angiogenesis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Selective Accumulation of Poly(Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid) Nanoparticles in Endotheliocytes and Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Cultured as Mixed-Cell Spheroids.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of the Behavior of 3D-Printed Endothelial Cells in Different Bioinks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sprouting angiogenesis is the common response of live tissues to physiological and pathological angiogenic stimuli. Its accurate evaluation is of utmost importance for basic research and practical medicine and pharmacology and requires adequate experimental models. A variety of assays for angiogenesis were developed, none of them perfect. In vitro approaches are generally less physiologically relevant due to the omission of essential components regulating the process. However, only in vitro models can be entirely non-xenogeneic. The limitations of the in vitro angiogenesis assays can be partially overcome using 3D models mimicking tissue O
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.